The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Is european sentiment changing towards THE ROC?

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby pantelis » Sat Mar 05, 2005 7:55 am

pantelis
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 2:41 am
Location: USA

Postby insan » Sat Mar 05, 2005 12:04 pm

All EU countries that are also the allies of NATO are free to cooperate, collaborate with boss of the NATO(US). Which EU countries gave support and still give support to US operations in Middle East? So why woouldn't Turkey be able to maintain her relations with US afterwards her EU membership? What's the core opposition element of Christian Democrat, conservatist stance against Turkey? Islam or Kurds and human rights related issues?
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby cannedmoose » Sat Mar 05, 2005 2:15 pm

Saint Jimmy wrote:P.S.: by the way, moose, what's this
cannedmoose wrote:Christofias Image
all about?


Saint James, it's my personal beef with ChristofiasImage, whenever I have to write his name, I comfort myself by placing a little devil alongside... I just find him a slightly loathsome character and a sly politician to boot
User avatar
cannedmoose
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4279
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: England

Postby MicAtCyp » Sun Mar 06, 2005 1:41 pm

boulio wrote: do people think that turkey and the t/c have dropped the ball by letting the momentum for voting yes in april slip away?


The whole word forgot about the Invasion just 2 years after re boulio. You think they would remember a yes voting more than 2 months??? The only ones who remember is Verhoigen and De-soto cause of the money they were lubricated with.
User avatar
MicAtCyp
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 10:10 am

Postby cannedmoose » Sun Mar 06, 2005 1:48 pm

MicAtCyp wrote:The whole word forgot about the Invasion just 2 years after re boulio. You think they would remember a yes voting more than 2 months??? The only ones who remember is Verhoigen and De-soto cause of the money they were lubricated with.


If you have any proof of foul play by Verheugen and De Soto, produce it.
User avatar
cannedmoose
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4279
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: England

Postby MicAtCyp » Sun Mar 06, 2005 1:54 pm

De Sotos job is at Sahara now isn't it? What is he doing following Papadopoulos everywhere he goes?
By the way he and Verhoigen would be stupid to let solid evidence behind.The signs are evident though. Whoever can see them, good for him.
I guess you cannot see anything.
User avatar
MicAtCyp
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 10:10 am

Postby cannedmoose » Sun Mar 06, 2005 2:09 pm

MicAtCyp wrote:De Sotos job is at Sahara now isn't it? What is he doing following Papadopoulos everywhere he goes?
By the way he and Verhoigen would be stupid to let solid evidence behind.The signs are evident though. Whoever can see them, good for him.
I guess you cannot see anything.


I guess you have a different set of contact lenses MicAtCyp, nonetheless, I suggest you have some proof before you start labelling these men as subject to bribery, I haven't seen any and I'm sure as hell it would be a big issue for both the UN and EU if they were...

As for De Soto's involvement in Western Sahara, if anything I'd regard that as a poison chalice, Morocco has no interest or imperative to give up that territory and no-one in the world has an interest in making them do so. Unfortunately, De Soto's been given another seemingly insoluble problem.

Also, does anyone have any evidence of TPap venturing into the Western Sahara as MicAtCyp seems to have dreamed? I can just see TPap dressed as Laurence of Arabia :lol:
User avatar
cannedmoose
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4279
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: England

Postby erolz » Sun Mar 06, 2005 2:14 pm

MicAtCyp wrote:De Sotos job is at Sahara now isn't it? What is he doing following Papadopoulos everywhere he goes?
By the way he and Verhoigen would be stupid to let solid evidence behind.The signs are evident though. Whoever can see them, good for him.
I guess you cannot see anything.


Your statements about Verheugen and De Soto to me seem like libel?
erolz
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Girne / Kyrenia

Postby Piratis » Sun Mar 06, 2005 2:31 pm

Your statements about Verheugen and De Soto to me seem like libel?

So does the statements expressed by some in here about Papadopoulos - Christofias.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby MicAtCyp » Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:08 pm

Cannedmoose,
the best thing accedemics are good at, is to cause a deeeep sleep to their students at the auditorium....
In real life my friend there is absolutely no case that involves millions (*) in which there is no lubrication.Take that for granted. You name it. Government purchases, sales of Commercial aircrafts, Military equipment, narcotics etc.
You want proof? You will never get one!

A few years back I dared asked an Austrian colleque what happens in Austria. You know how "absolute minded" the Germans/Austrians are. He told be rather angrily "i told you it's everywhere in the world, don't ask me again"
So I guess the same reply goes to you Cannedmoose.

Cannedmoose wrote: Also, does anyone have any evidence of TPap venturing into the Western Sahara as MicAtCyp seems to have dreamed?


It seems to me that in your dreams, you see me dreaming. I was talking about the incident at Luxemberg man, where De Soto just traveled to oppose Papadopoulos speach. Wake up!

Erol, you are right, in the real world that would be libel. Do you think if I were a politician I would reveal such thoughts publicly?!
What I would do is be careful from those guys in the future, not trust them anymore, or lubricate my own keypersons. Does the statement of Papadopoulos that "we do not accept arbitration anymore" sound relevant to you?

PS1 *The Cyprus issue involves BILLIONS not millions

PS2. I could present one by one the cases indicating "something fishy" behind the actions of both Verhoigen and De Soto. But what for? You could still accuse me of having no solid proof...

PS3. What does this Canned-moose mean? Is it some sort of canned food, or what? Just curious.
User avatar
MicAtCyp
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 10:10 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest