humanist
VP I am finding some of the debates here a little problematic, firstly why is up the the Cypriots in the free area to persuade Cypriots in the occupied areas that Turkish army ought to leave?
Babacan express a view that they had reason to interevence and even today they have reason to stay has nothing has been resolved. What explanation can you give to persuade TCs that the army shouls leave.
Secondly Talat needs to decide as to whether he wants to take leadership in this matter and be recognised as the person to communicate on this issue or whether he wants Turkey to act as the negotiator in this matter, in which case he needs to ask the perceived occupier and invador of Cyprus to leave as Turkey will not listen to the RoC government.
Why should he? why dont Papadop take the lead?
How about Talat negotiates that Turkey withdraws troops over 5 years,
Why? we dont want that until we gwt a comprehesive solution as you people can try to take the wholei island by force without Turkey around to stop you.
UN steps up the protection role and within 21 days of the last remaining Turkish troop leave Cyprus soil the national guard is dismantled?
UN cant protect jack shit, no TC trust them to take action in time of crisis.
So the Turkey Army goes and the UN protect us against a GC national Guard who promises to dismantle..hardly feasable dotn you thin we woudl have to trust GCs and thats out of the question in 2007.