The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Discussion, Debate, or something else?

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby zan » Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:45 pm

DT. wrote:
zan wrote:
Piratis wrote:
utu wrote:Get Real, The tone of your posts are doing noone any favors here. Your referring to expatkiwi as a 'scumbag' and referring to Eric dayi as 'someone who makes me laugh' rings rather hollow after other forum members refer to you as a blackmailer. It doesn't help you, or your cause if you have to refer to antagonism and threats. The term 'moral high ground' comes to mind.

Piratus, Your comments regarding foreign interests and how it relates to the Cyprus problem is food for thought. The island is in a strategic location in Eurasia and as such, one has to wonder who - outside of Turkey, Greece, and the UK - would benefit most from the status quo.

The real issue is - IMHO - what do the people living in Cyprus want? I suppose that peace is the answer, but under what terms? Expatkiwi's observation of 'divorced couples not being able to live together under one roof' is a valid simile, so forced amalgamation would end up reigniting conflict. What is left? Reconciliation really cannot take place until mutual suspicions are removed. It doesn't leave many choices, does it?


If somebody came and told you "Give me your land and property or face conflict with me" what would you do? We of course have the right to fight to defend what belongs to us against those that have no right to demand it.

TCs are not the only ethnic minority in the world, and Cyprus is not the only country that had some conflict between its ethnic groups in the past. Just like ethnic groups in other countries have learned to coexist under a democratic state where each citizen is equal without racist discriminations and without one trying to steal the land of another, so can we.

The problem is that the Turks want to use brute force in order to gain on our loss, and as long as they choose conflict they should be sure that we will fight for our rights and not capitulate.

Therefore the solution is not "force the majority of Cypriots* to capitulate and give up their rights and land", but "force the TCs/Turkey to accept what is the norm in every other country in the world"(Even Turkey itself with its 20% Kurdish community!!)

* With "majority of Cypriots" above I don't refer only to GCs, but to Armenian Cypriots, Latin Cypriots, Maronite Cypriots and everybody else who has the Cypriot citizenship. We (all Cypriots except TCs) will not accept to become second category citizens. The Turks should realize that the Ottoman era is over, and now they have to accept democracy and human rights, and they can not impose by force whatever they feel like.


For once and for all numbskull...We are not an ethnic minority but partners in Cyprus and we will accept nothing else!!!


Hey! I thought we're debating in UTU style now....whats with the insults Zan?



Please accept my apologies......I forgot the Forum protocol for a minute. :roll:


I spent a while telling utu that we are uncouth farmers and you all start to behave like gentlemen :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby zan » Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:46 pm

Piratis wrote:zan, I replied to utu because he asked for a rational debate without insults.

So in this thread I will not bother with your insulting and irrational statements.

If we separate Cypriots into different groups where one group is much bigger than the other, then the smaller group constitutes a minority by definition. Of course I would have no problem not to separate Cypriots in any groups, but I know that you wouldn't accept that.

If you base your "argument" on your understanding of the 1960 agreements, then I should remind you that with those agreements you were only the "minor partner" since the GCs had the president and TCs the vice president.

P.S. the world "partnership" is mentioned nowhere officially.


If it walks like a duck and........................ :roll:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:10 am

Get Real! wrote:
utu wrote:A healthy forum is one where abusive and threatening language is not used in order to intimidate or egg on other forum members. At least that is how I define it. IMHO...


Let's ask Zanny for his opinion... Zanny am I an intimidating person and/or egg on member's faces?



When did you pack the intimidating in GetReal? - Sorry, nobody asked me. :oops:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby zan » Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:19 am

denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
utu wrote:A healthy forum is one where abusive and threatening language is not used in order to intimidate or egg on other forum members. At least that is how I define it. IMHO...


Let's ask Zanny for his opinion... Zanny am I an intimidating person and/or egg on member's faces?



When did you pack the intimidating in GetReal? - Sorry, nobody asked me. :oops:



:lol: :lol:

He tells me that I am from an inferior race then posts the details of a person on the Net for ALL to see and then asks stupid questions... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:25 am

zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
utu wrote:A healthy forum is one where abusive and threatening language is not used in order to intimidate or egg on other forum members. At least that is how I define it. IMHO...


Let's ask Zanny for his opinion... Zanny am I an intimidating person and/or egg on member's faces?



When did you pack the intimidating in GetReal? - Sorry, nobody asked me. :oops:



:lol: :lol:

He tells me that I am from an inferior race then posts the details of a person on the Net for ALL to see and then asks stupid questions... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:



Zan, whats the matter with you? You call that intimidating? Thats GetReal just being nice :roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby zan » Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:31 am

denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
utu wrote:A healthy forum is one where abusive and threatening language is not used in order to intimidate or egg on other forum members. At least that is how I define it. IMHO...


Let's ask Zanny for his opinion... Zanny am I an intimidating person and/or egg on member's faces?



When did you pack the intimidating in GetReal? - Sorry, nobody asked me. :oops:



:lol: :lol:

He tells me that I am from an inferior race then posts the details of a person on the Net for ALL to see and then asks stupid questions... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:



Zan, whats the matter with you? You call that intimidating? Thats GetReal just being nice :roll: :roll: :roll:



OK! I will put him back on my Christmas list... :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby boomerang » Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:42 am

zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
utu wrote:A healthy forum is one where abusive and threatening language is not used in order to intimidate or egg on other forum members. At least that is how I define it. IMHO...


Let's ask Zanny for his opinion... Zanny am I an intimidating person and/or egg on member's faces?



When did you pack the intimidating in GetReal? - Sorry, nobody asked me. :oops:



:lol: :lol:

He tells me that I am from an inferior race then posts the details of a person on the Net for ALL to see and then asks stupid questions... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:


these details were on the net long before GR got a hold of them...They are public information in a public domain...
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby utu » Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:52 am

Phoenix,

I'm trying to find out what it is that made someone else try to resort to blackmail to silence him. Get Real may have felt affronted by information he felt was wrongly portrayed by expatkiwi on wikipedia, but Get Real's way of dealing with expatkiwi is frankly worrying, and I really have a problem with that kind of tactic used on ANYONE.
But getting away from that, the basic debate topic is still unchanged: dealing with the Cyprus Problem, and looking at the various options. One needs common ground to start from, so what are things that we can agree on?
User avatar
utu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:32 am
Location: British Columbia

Postby DT. » Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:31 am

zan wrote:
DT. wrote:
zan wrote:
Piratis wrote:
utu wrote:Get Real, The tone of your posts are doing noone any favors here. Your referring to expatkiwi as a 'scumbag' and referring to Eric dayi as 'someone who makes me laugh' rings rather hollow after other forum members refer to you as a blackmailer. It doesn't help you, or your cause if you have to refer to antagonism and threats. The term 'moral high ground' comes to mind.

Piratus, Your comments regarding foreign interests and how it relates to the Cyprus problem is food for thought. The island is in a strategic location in Eurasia and as such, one has to wonder who - outside of Turkey, Greece, and the UK - would benefit most from the status quo.

The real issue is - IMHO - what do the people living in Cyprus want? I suppose that peace is the answer, but under what terms? Expatkiwi's observation of 'divorced couples not being able to live together under one roof' is a valid simile, so forced amalgamation would end up reigniting conflict. What is left? Reconciliation really cannot take place until mutual suspicions are removed. It doesn't leave many choices, does it?


If somebody came and told you "Give me your land and property or face conflict with me" what would you do? We of course have the right to fight to defend what belongs to us against those that have no right to demand it.

TCs are not the only ethnic minority in the world, and Cyprus is not the only country that had some conflict between its ethnic groups in the past. Just like ethnic groups in other countries have learned to coexist under a democratic state where each citizen is equal without racist discriminations and without one trying to steal the land of another, so can we.

The problem is that the Turks want to use brute force in order to gain on our loss, and as long as they choose conflict they should be sure that we will fight for our rights and not capitulate.

Therefore the solution is not "force the majority of Cypriots* to capitulate and give up their rights and land", but "force the TCs/Turkey to accept what is the norm in every other country in the world"(Even Turkey itself with its 20% Kurdish community!!)

* With "majority of Cypriots" above I don't refer only to GCs, but to Armenian Cypriots, Latin Cypriots, Maronite Cypriots and everybody else who has the Cypriot citizenship. We (all Cypriots except TCs) will not accept to become second category citizens. The Turks should realize that the Ottoman era is over, and now they have to accept democracy and human rights, and they can not impose by force whatever they feel like.


For once and for all numbskull...We are not an ethnic minority but partners in Cyprus and we will accept nothing else!!!


Hey! I thought we're debating in UTU style now....whats with the insults Zan?



Please accept my apologies......I forgot the Forum protocol for a minute. :roll:


I spent a while telling utu that we are uncouth farmers and you all start to behave like gentlemen :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


aorry mate, forgot to tell you. We all went out and got bow ties as well. 8)
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby zan » Thu Sep 27, 2007 3:14 pm

utu wrote:Phoenix,

I'm trying to find out what it is that made someone else try to resort to blackmail to silence him. Get Real may have felt affronted by information he felt was wrongly portrayed by expatkiwi on wikipedia, but Get Real's way of dealing with expatkiwi is frankly worrying, and I really have a problem with that kind of tactic used on ANYONE.
But getting away from that, the basic debate topic is still unchanged: dealing with the Cyprus Problem, and looking at the various options. One needs common ground to start from, so what are things that we can agree on?



With he greatest respect utu, the only thing we have agreed on is that we cannot agree on anything. We can't even agree on who or what is a Cypriot. Of course this criteria only applies to TCs and all Gcs are as a matter of course. :roll: :roll: :roll: The goal posts are on wheels as well..... :lol: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest