by devil » Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:14 pm
Yup, Nikitas, what you say is true, but there is a lot of argument as what is "acceptable", especially bitumen dust from road "asphalt", which is possibly carcinogenic. There are two schools of thought regarding carcinogens. One states there is a threshold level below which cancer will not develop and the other states that exposure to minute levels has a cumulative effect. Unfortunately, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to prove either school is right because of confounding factors. In reality, it would seem that both or neither are right and that constant minute exposure does not cause cancer to develop, but it may reduce the body's immune system so that if exposure to a higher level occurs subsequently, it may have a more serious effect than if the earlier exposure had not occurred. Epidemiology is not a really exact science and relies on statistical surveys with cohorts of thousands of persons in varying situations for a picture to develop.
I remember, I was operating a sensitive analytical instrument in my lab about 20 m from a main road one cold day. I started to get some unexpected results and found that the problem was caused by a mixture of salt and calcium chloride. I scratched my head as to where it could come from. Looking out the window, I saw a road gritter passing on the main road. Going out, I found it was salting the road as they expected black ice to form. Car tyres crushed the salt and threw it up as a very fine dust, actually an aerosol suspension, and it drifted into my lab within a matter of minutes, through closed doors and windows. This shows how pervasive road dust is. The quantity was tiny, but enough to upset my instrument, which was sensitive to the order of nanograms, and would otherwise be undetectable (and, of course, harmless to humans). I had a client in Rennes, in the root of Britanny, about 50 km from the coast, and he had a similar experience but when there was a strong onshore storm wind blowing sea salt all that distance.