Alexandros Lordos wrote:insan wrote:
1- End of occupation and withdrawal of all Turkish troops.
2- Return of all refugess and restitution of GC refugees by Turkey.
3- A GC state based on democratic principles, i.e; "majority rule".
4- Repatriation of most of the settlers.
5- No-bi zonality. All refugees will return to their ancestral properties and lands.
6- Nullification of treaty of guarantee and treaty of alliance.
Now can someone tell me whether there is something I've misunderstood or missed?
Insan,
I think you are confusing the GC "ideal wish list" with the GC negotiating position and "maximum tolerance limit".
No, I'm not confusing them, Alexandros. That's what I and all of us are still hearing and reading what comes from the other side's leadership and most of the GCs participate on this forum and other discussion forums.
While most GCs would like to see most of the things on your list, very few would actually insist on all of them, there is a willingness to compromise in order to take into account the TC position.
The things I've been hearing from GC leadership and the attitudes of most of the GCs I've witnessed so far, telling me the opposite of what you are saying.
Let's take your points one-by-one:
1. End of occupation/withdrawal of all Turkish Troops - No question about that. This is a must in GC minds.
Is there a little space in their minds for TCs must as well. Something like gradual demilitarization of Cyprus, for example. Including the gradual reduction of National Guard. I haven't heard GC leadership or any groups of GCs refering just a single word about it.
2. Return of all refugees and compensation by Turkey - this is also a must for the great majority, though moderate limitations to restitution might just about be tolerated, if it can be shown that they are absolutely necessary.
Is de-facto partition and ongoing occupation just Turkey's fault? Yes according to GC leadership and their biased history books it is and overwhelming majority of GCs suppose it is true and put all the blame on Turkey and point her the only responsible of the damage and loss of use of GC refugees. The fact is that Turkey had left no choice other than a de-facto partition in 1974. Ask Clerides, Stavrinides, Markidis those whom their books are banned or accused of being the traitors. The 30 years of ongoing occupation is not Turkey's fault. Which leader of GC community did acknowledge the "political equality" of TC community. Which leader of GC community have put forth the idea that withdrawal of all turkish troops is not fair and feasible under the circumstances, therefore a gradual reduction of military presence on both sides was the most feasible under the circumstances.
But according to your leadership and deluded majority; Turkey is the only responsible because of the 30 years of ongoing occupation and have to compensate all GC refugees.
3. A GC state based on majority rule - No Insan, we don't live in the clouds. That is why even those who do not like Federation much, tend to talk about agreed partition rather than all Cyprus becoming a GC state. GCs might have liked a simple majority situation, but they know this issue is critical to TCs and therefore they won't insist.
Alexandros, I'm not hearing and seeing-impaired. In every sppech of Tassos, he bases his arguments upon democrasy and human rights of each individual who are citizens of Cyprus. You can't find just a single statement made by Tassos based upon the acknowledgement of "poltical equality" of two communities. While there are just 3 or 4 GCs here on this board support "political equality" of two communities; all others are against it. And if you visit all other Greek and GC dominated discussion boards, you'll see that none of them support the idea of "political equality" of two communities.
4. Repatriation of most of the Settlers - Yes, this is a must to almost every GC. Perhaps a combination of compulsory repatriation plus voluntary departures through incentives might do the trick here (a noteworthy point here: The idea I have posted in another thread, that settlers should be granted Green Cards if they so wish so that they can emigrate to the US, has actually been floated by the Americans a couple of years ago. Guess what? Denktash thought it was absolutely unacceptable, saying that "these are my citizens, and you can't take them away from me"...)
I'm not against what you've offered but hiding behind the laws and forcing them to leave Cyprus is not fair. On the other hand don't forget that they are the naturalized citizens of a de-facto administrtaion. I also want most of them to repatriated but not because they are "illegal". Because they occupy GC properties for free and compensating, relocating, building new homes for them will raise the cost of reunification.
5. No Bizonality - All refugees to return. Insan, that's not the way it would work. Even if all refugees returned there would still be effective bizonality. I've illustrated the maths of this in another thread and I won't repeat myself here. Our side has been aware of this ever since 1977, otherwise we wouldn't have signed the high level agreements, but you guys have been brainwashed by Denktash into thinking that if all refugees return it will be the end of bizonality. It will be the end of apartheid, that's for sure, but it won't be the end of bizonality, or of a TC majority in the north as per the 1977 and 1979 agreements.
Alexandros, according to the many sources GC refugges was constituting 1/3 of GC population pre-74. Today they should still have constituted at least 1/3 of GC population. Their approx. number should be around 250.000 - 300.000.
Let's say 50.000 settlers repatriated in 10 years time and 150.000 refugees + 50 non refugees returned/settled to TCCS.. and let's suppose some 20.000 TCs returned from abroad and settled down to TCCS. The population ratio in TCCs would have been composed by 2.25 TCs/2 GCs. It is obvious that there's a hardcore opposition against all kinds of "ethnic discrimination". It is obvious that they will demand their full political rights. They will demand exactly the same rights which the TC residents of TCCS have. How you can be so optimistic that they would compromise on their political rights while they shout that restricting their political rights is an ethnic discrimination. The ones who consider that we are all Cypriots, not two communities on political level and should have the same political rights as the citizens of Cyprus; are still constituting the majority among GCs. Is my counter-argument sounds like Denkash's. If not I'm looking forward to hear your apologies regarding the "brain-washing" part.
6. Nullification of treaty of guarantee - Most GCs would love to see this happen, however it is widely accepted that it is very difficult to happen. So the thinking of most is focusing on how to limit intervention rights so that they are not a threat to GC security, rather than annuling the Treaty of Guarantee. However, I think that if we can find a mutually satisfactory alternative system of security, we should certainly pursue it, together.