Agios Amvrosios wrote:Ok so we are expected to negotiate on ethnic cleansing. Some issues are simply are not negotiable. Ethnic cleansing cannot simply be dealt with by the remedy of monetary compensation.
This is not a matter which anyother modern democratic European country is asked to horsetrade on. Negotiating on ethnic cleansing is an abomonation from the dark ages.
And you will probably say that property speculators purchased refugee land in 'good faith as well. These people took a gamble on the institutionalisation of ethnic cleansing and lost. There is only one certain way that property speculators can legally buy land in the occupied north and that is by purchasing land which makes up the 8% owned by Turkish Cypriots.
Another problem is that the Annan Plan did not in fact provide firm details of the withdrawal of Turkish Troops.
Well, if you refuse to negotiate then you will get nowhere. Ethnic cleansing took place for TCs too, as has been discussed on this forum ad nauseam.
And there's no point in comparing what might have happened in a modern European country because Cyprus is only superficially modern and in reality is a backward, inward-looking hotbed of prejudice and nationalism. And now Cyprus is painfully having to emerge from the dark ages and face up to its past and move on - something which it appears not willing or ready to do yet.
In this respect you have more in common with Albania or Kosovo or developing non-European states.
The property sales to foreigners amount to 0.1% of the island and have taken place in the last 2 years. The focus this issue is given is out of proportion to its actual magnitude.
Your quibble about the detail in the Annan Plan is disingenuous because if there was any general stomach for a solution broadly along its lines a point like this would have been negotiated upon.
The fact is that you - as you readily admit - would rather have nothing than a lot if it involves compromise.