Cyprus-Forum.com

[denizaksulu]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

GetReal, you are a helpful chap; could you tell me what 'pulvarized' means, please?

Allow me Denizaksulu

. . . It's a crushed PULSAR!

Yeh, right. You make up your own words as you go along then? your own 'intellectual prowess' amazes me. Carry on please.

It's called "free-association"

(and typing too fast without bothering with spell-checkers)

You can dress it as you like. I will forgive your trsspasses. I will not get angry with your comments as it is the Holy month. I must apologise I mentioned Holy oth, wrong thread again.

[phoenix]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

GetReal, you are a helpful chap; could you tell me what 'pulvarized' means, please?

Allow me Denizaksulu

. . . It's a crushed PULSAR!

Yeh, right. You make up your own words as you go along then? your own 'intellectual prowess' amazes me. Carry on please.

It's called "free-association"

(and typing too fast without bothering with spell-checkers)

You can dress it as you like. I will forgive your trsspasses. I will not get angry with your comments as it is the Holy month. I must apologise I mentioned Holy oth, wrong thread again.

Denizaksulu: Apologies to you . . . although I have not got a clue what I have done . . . unless you are jumping in with pre-formed biased notions?

[miltiades]

I do not believe in God , why ? DOESNT EXIST !!

[denizaksulu]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

GetReal, you are a helpful chap; could you tell me what 'pulvarized' means, please?

Allow me Denizaksulu

. . . It's a crushed PULSAR!

Yeh, right. You make up your own words as you go along then? your own 'intellectual prowess' amazes me. Carry on please.

It's called "free-association"

(and typing too fast without bothering with spell-checkers)

You can dress it as you like. I will forgive your trsspasses. I will not get angry with your comments as it is the Holy month. I must apologise I mentioned Holy oth, wrong thread again.

Denizaksulu: Apologies to you . . . although I have not got a clue what I have done . . . unless you are jumping in with pre-formed biased notions?

Me biased, you prejudiced? Its the way of the world. You cannot help it.

[phoenix]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

GetReal, you are a helpful chap; could you tell me what 'pulvarized' means, please?

Allow me Denizaksulu

. . . It's a crushed PULSAR!

Yeh, right. You make up your own words as you go along then? your own 'intellectual prowess' amazes me. Carry on please.

It's called "free-association"

(and typing too fast without bothering with spell-checkers)

You can dress it as you like. I will forgive your trsspasses. I will not get angry with your comments as it is the Holy month. I must apologise I mentioned Holy oth, wrong thread again.

Denizaksulu: Apologies to you . . . although I have not got a clue what I have done . . . unless you are jumping in with pre-formed biased notions?

Me biased, you prejudiced? Its the way of the world. You cannot help it.

I pride myself on not being prejudiced . . .
I ask questions then form opinions . . . it's the way of my world.

[denizaksulu]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

GetReal, you are a helpful chap; could you tell me what 'pulvarized' means, please?

Allow me Denizaksulu

. . . It's a crushed PULSAR!

Yeh, right. You make up your own words as you go along then? your own 'intellectual prowess' amazes me. Carry on please.

It's called "free-association"

(and typing too fast without bothering with spell-checkers)

You can dress it as you like. I will forgive your trsspasses. I will not get angry with your comments as it is the Holy month. I must apologise I mentioned Holy oth, wrong thread again.

Denizaksulu: Apologies to you . . . although I have not got a clue what I have done . . . unless you are jumping in with pre-formed biased notions?

Me biased, you prejudiced? Its the way of the world. You cannot help it.

I pride myself on not being prejudiced . . .
I ask questions then form opinions . . . it's the way of my world.

GetReal is being so polite these few postings, me thinks his personality is going through a division again. Why am I telling you this?

[Get Real!]

GetReal is being so polite these few postings, me thinks his personality is going through a division again. Why am I telling you this?

That's an Amoeba you're confusing me with...

[phoenix]

GetReal is being so polite these few postings, me thinks his personality is going through a division again. Why am I telling you this?

That's an Amoeba you're confusing me with...

It's a bit on the green side, so it's probably Spirogyra.

[denizaksulu]

GetReal is being so polite these few postings, me thinks his personality is going through a division again. Why am I telling you this?

That's an Amoeba you're confusing me with...

You are talking of low life, I am talking higher forms of life. Meiosis or mitosis maybe. Yet if the cap fits, I would say but I wouldn't. As GR you deserve better. But Phoenix well.......

[Jerry]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

GetReal, you are a helpful chap; could you tell me what 'pulvarized' means, please?

Allow me Denizaksulu

. . . It's a crushed PULSAR!

Yeh, right. You make up your own words as you go along then? your own 'intellectual prowess' amazes me. Carry on please.

It's called "free-association"

(and typing too fast without bothering with spell-checkers)

You can dress it as you like. I will forgive your trsspasses. I will not get angry with your comments as it is the Holy month. I must apologise I mentioned Holy oth, wrong thread again.

Denizaksulu: Apologies to you . . . although I have not got a clue what I have done . . . unless you are jumping in with pre-formed biased notions?

Me biased, you prejudiced? Its the way of the world. You cannot help it.

I pride myself on not being prejudiced . . .
I ask questions then form opinions . . . it's the way of my world.

GetReal is being so polite these few postings, me thinks his personality is going through a division again. Why am I telling you this?

Is this the forum record for quotes in quotes in quotes in quotes......etc?