Cyprus-Forum.com

[Steve0505]

Niki
Once when I was in a nightclub I asked a girl to dance, she said no.

So I asked her whether she would sleep with me for a million pound, she said probably.

Now I had established what sort of girl she was it was all about the haggling.

You make the analogy and then try justifying it to the displaced, dispossest and the deseased

Principles eh. how much are they worth

[phoenix]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

[Get Real!]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

[phoenix]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

Forgone conclusion!!

I think you will find that the competition has sidled off to the North for some comfort and to brand the 40,000.

Did someone mention a prize?

[denizaksulu]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

GetReal, you are a helpful chap; could you tell me what 'pulvarized' means, please?

[Get Real!]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

GetReal, you are a helpful chap; could you tell me what 'pulvarized' means, please?

It’s the burning desire to pull an opponent’s hair!

[phoenix]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

GetReal, you are a helpful chap; could you tell me what 'pulvarized' means, please?

Allow me Denizaksulu

. . . It's a crushed PULSAR!

[Get Real!]

Seriously Deniz, remember in the sixties when you use to watch “Lost in Space.........”

Well, those ray guns they had could "pulverize" the enemy!

[denizaksulu]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

GetReal, you are a helpful chap; could you tell me what 'pulvarized' means, please?

Allow me Denizaksulu

. . . It's a crushed PULSAR!

Yeh, right. You make up your own words as you go along then? your own 'intellectual prowess' amazes me. Carry on please.

[phoenix]

Let me see - "airhead", fuddled logic", "expensive mistake". Yes I can see how this is constructive criticism!

No these are CONCLUSIONS !

You chose to ignore the criticisms because they stung (like the best ointment).

Niki, your surreptitious market research, which you now claim you are conducting, is flawed, since you are choosing the "best-fit".

Besides, I thought you came on with an ethical dilemma, but it has transpired you were MERELY paying lip-service. Shame!

I CONCLUDE with the same remarks as above, only add: improper and common for propagating pitiful credentials.

It has become apparent that you are trying to shoe-horn this thread to fit into your own biased viewpoint. Nothing you say has any connection or relevance and as you are determined to change this into something other than the original intention I choose not to respond to your comments any further.

PULVARIZED!

Sorry Niki for trying to spar with you . . . . .

I was misinformed regarding your intellectual prowess!

May I suggest a hair pulling competition with me as the prize?

GetReal, you are a helpful chap; could you tell me what 'pulvarized' means, please?

Allow me Denizaksulu

. . . It's a crushed PULSAR!

Yeh, right. You make up your own words as you go along then? your own 'intellectual prowess' amazes me. Carry on please.

It's called "free-association"

(and typing too fast without bothering with spell-checkers)