Whereas I do not wish to cause any distress to THE HIGHLANDER subsequent to the unfortunate loss of his pet Wiemaraner, I do feel that a little more consideration should be given to alternative possibilities surrounding it's death.
I have spoken to certain fruit farmers and am informed that the use of 'Lannate' is essential in protecting their produce, it would therefore be unfair to impose severe restrictions on it's use and probably explains why they are not.
As to the 'Poisoning' issue, I spoke to a veterinary surgeon and am informed that the visible signs of 'Heat Exhaustion' and 'Poisoning' are very similar in fatal situations.
Since this particular incident occured in the manner and location as described by THE HIGHLANDER, it seems (once again) a little unfair to draw conclusions.
THE HIGHLANDER mentions that there was a high incidence of similar cases in the same area, if the nature of those fatalities are similar to the one under scrutiny, does it not make more sense to assume that 'Heat Exhaustion' is more likely to be the cause?.
Acceptance of that fact does not indicate neglect, rather it would serve as a lesson learned when dealing with situations where it may be necessary to leave an animal unattended in a car on a hot day.
Much sympathy is due to THE HIGHLANDER, I just cannot visualize a poisoner furtively sneaking through a cark park with a soupspoonful of 'Lannate', poking it through the aperture of a car window, intent on destroying a helpless animal.
It just doesn't add up to good sense, regardless of how docile the dog may be, (most would be up and at 'em).
I wonder if any other member will either share these opinions or propose others
.