Application against Cyprus
for 1960 voting rights
By Philippos Stylianou
TWO Turkish Cypriots living in the occupied areas yesterday announced that they have launched an application to the Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against the Cyprus government, seeking "to reactivate" their political rights under the 1960 Cyprus Constitution.
Ali Erel, former chairman of the Turkish Cypriot Chamber of Commerce, and Mustafa Damdelen, name Greek Cypriot lawyers Achilleas Demetriades and Nicolas Kyriacou as their legal representatives in Strasbourg.
Demetriades is known from the ground-breaking cases of Greek Cypriot refugees Titina Loizidou and Myra Xenides-Aresti, who won huge amounts of compensation from the ECHR against Turkey for violation of their property rights.
Commenting on the development, Achilleas Demetriades described it as "an important move at the legal level," noting that he did not want to go into the politics of it.
"It is not possible for Cypriot citizens to be deprived of certain human rights because of their ethnic origin," he told The Cyprus Weekly yesterday and added: "As for the political aspect, you could perhaps ask the presidential candidates what they think of it."
Unlike Ibrahim Aziz, another Turkish Cypriot who enrolled on the general electoral register of Cyprus after winning a case at the ECHR, Erel and Damdelen seek to revive the separate Turkish Cypriot electoral roll as expressly provided in the 1960 Constitution for 24 deputies.
They base their application on Article 3 Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of legislature.
Good chance
Demetriades said that the fact the applicants were not resident in the government-controlled areas could not deprive them of their rights and said his clients stood a good chance of winning.
But prominent lawyer Diko MP Andreas Angelides held a different view. He drew attention to the fact that the ECHR in the case of Ibrahim Aziz had gone beyond the 1960 Constitution, ruling that the discrimination of two separate electoral registers was unacceptable.
"I don’t think that the Court can contradict itself so glaringly by reversing its previous judgment," he said.
Angelides recalled that the Supreme Court of Cyprus had invoked the law of necessity to suspend the separate Turkish electoral register. Following the ECHR decision in the Aziz case, the Constitution was amended making possible the enrolment of Turkish Cypriots on the general register, provided they were resident in the free area for 6 months.
"Erel and Damdelen are not even residents," Angelides noted. In his view they seek to create political impressions in favour of the current situation on the island.
The Turkish Cypriot applicants made no secret of this when they initiated their move in February 2006. Representing a group of 78 by the collective name of "Jasmine" they had then presented a petition to the Interior Minister, who turned them down.
Rejected
Asked by the journalists how they could claim to have voting rights both in the occupied and the free part of the island, Ali Erel had said: "The Republic of Cyprus was established as a bi-communal state; it is not bi-communal in real life, it is mono-communal. So, what we are aiming at is a bi-communal umbrella, a state in the north and a state in the south, as it is well said in the Annan Plan."
According to their statements, they planned to apply first to the Cyprus Supreme Court and then to European Court of Human Rights if they were rejected.
Following the rejection of their request by the Interior Ministry, they filed an application with the Supreme Court which rejected it basing its ruling on the law of necessity.
Erel and Damdelen announced their application to the ECHR using a letterhead of the "Cyprus EU Association" in occupied Nicosia.