twinkle wrote:I don't give a rats arse that they could see the room from the restaurant. No right minded person leaves a child under age of 10 alone with 2 other kids. I always suspected the parents were involved.
Why didn't the "abductor" take the other kids? Why didn't anyone see anything? Or hear anything?
All too fishy for me.
Problem is IF this child had been taken, with all the publicity they would have had to get rid of her quick. No chance she's still alive, poor little soul. If this is the case, I blame the parents for leaving the kid. Educated yet no common sense....Stupid people! Would they have left her alone in the UK.
everybody thinks the parants are involved. i dont know if we can beleive them but everything is so weird.
Senarios say that maybe an accident happend while the kids were alone and when the parents found out they wanted to hide it and make it look as an abduction because they were gonna get in trouble for leaving three little kids anattended.
Secondly the little girl if she was abduted wouldnt she cried or screamed if a "stranger" took her and if she screamed the other two wouldnt they cried too . ? Nobody heard anything !! there must have been a familiar person that took her.
what im wondering is ... the twins must have heard something or seen something. they are now 2 years old i think, and shortly they can SAY what they saw and heard and they can recognise the "abducter" or THE PARENTS !! what happes then ? didnt anybody think of that ?