Humanist,
BBF means it has to be a fixed quota of GCs in the TC component state that will guarantee the Tcs are ALWAYS the majority. This is against the EU law for free settlement.And of course against the rights of refugees.
Starting from this point other implications arise.
What kind of majority will they be satisfied with?? (60%,70%,80%, 90%???). The Anan Plan said 90% initially !!!! So the GCs who could return initially could be no more than 10%.
Then more implications. What if that 10% is concentrated e.g in Karpasia?
The Anan plan said, NO!! NOWHERE the Gcs could be more than 10%. So in each and every town/village the Gcs could not be more than 10%. This of course actually reduces the maximum possible total from 10% to about 5-6%%
Then even more implications. Is this 10% counted on the number of REAL TCs or TCs+settlers?
The Anan Plan said TCs+settlers. In other words we would have 45% real TCS+45% settlers +10% GCs!!!
And then you hear people like VP, Zan et al telling us we will never accept anything different than the Anan Plan....
NB. Bananiot and his proteges said "hey its good to have as many settlers as possible. This way more GCs could return because their 10% would be calculated on the total of TCs+settlers". Paranoia has no limits....