If I could understand the first sentence, then I would reply, however I would reply with a 'yes' to his question on morals.
Ok - let me break it down for you again thicko.
You said that Erolz had a good point asking why the Turkish Cypriots and Turkey should care about legality when then the RoC acted in a so-called illegal manor by wanting to alter the constitution that was forced on them.
What I am asking is if what the RoC did, wanting to bring a community's privileged rights into line with the other communities in Cyprus, is as bad as Turkey and Turkish Cypriots ethnically cleansing the north of Greek and other Christians, as well as holding a country and individual peoples property under occupation.
Therefore I want to know again if Turkish Cypriots still agree with Erolz deceitful post? Or did you all just start cheering his name because he is Turkish and decided to put your morals to one side (if you HAVE any).