Which one - your pain or your ambarassment? Cool
erolz wrote:Murataga wrote:
It was most likely prepared and submitted by the RoC officials in 1998 (as the report is classified "reports of states parties "), at a time when any and all TCs were ousted from the government. So no wonder...
THe source document that GR refered to is was written by the RoC and Submitted TO the UN BY the RoC. This is a fact and can be shown by the title of the document and the documents refernace number.Core document forming part of the reports of states parties : Cyprus. 23/07/98.
Core documents in UN terms are documents that indivdual states are legaly required to write and submit to the the UN. The core document for the state parties : Libiya is written by Libiya and submitted to the UN. This is true of EVERY core document. You can prove this via, common sense, looking at core documents for turkey, or looking up the UN websites own defintions of 'core documents' and 'state parties'Murataga wrote:
As far as the Secretary-General`s specific comment goes...
They are NOT the SG comments. S/6426 is one of the regular 6 month reports BY UNFICYP written not by the SG but by the head of UNFICYP. It is then as a matter of procedure , sumbmitted by the SG to the SC.
In fact s/6425 DOES include an addendum 'ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CYPRUS' whihs is very atypical for a 6 monthly report. It is alos a very interesting addendum for it details the TC leaderships attempts to return to their government positions and the (illegal) 'pre conditions' placed on them by Cleridies should they try and do so. I will post it here in full
the_snake_and_the_crane wrote:Which one - your pain or your ambarassment? Cool
Murataga - if your gonna accuse someone of being embarrassed, at least spell it right lol.
the_snake_and_the_crane wrote:Which one - your pain or your ambarassment? Cool
Murataga - if your gonna accuse someone of being embarrassed, at least spell it right lol.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests