The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Talat The Biggest Lying partitionsit that ever existed in Cy

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby halil » Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:55 pm

we, majority of the TC's are supporting Talat .
We were the only ones who said YES for unification.
İf u are thinking we are going to be second class in our own country. leak your fingers ....... stop insulting our president.
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby oranos64 » Wed Aug 22, 2007 3:14 pm

The failure to resolve the dispute has "deepened the sentiment of the people to avoid unification of the island," he said.

"This is a big danger. This of course lessens the options for politicians. Politicians cannot go against the people's will."

For decades, Northern Cyprus was dominated by hardline Turkish nationalists, notably Rauf Denktash. But Mr Talat, a moderate Left-winger who won office in 2005, favours unity and power-sharing.

"Today, the total power here in the North is under the control of pro-solution forces. If this changes, I don't know what will happen," said Mr Talat.

QUOTE FROM TALAT ..IS THIS GUY FOR REAL ....
User avatar
oranos64
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 982
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 1:45 pm
Location: LARNACA,CYPRUS ...

Postby DT. » Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:07 pm

halil wrote:we, majority of the TC's are supporting Talat .
We were the only ones who said YES for unification.
İf u are thinking we are going to be second class in our own country. leak your fingers ....... stop insulting our president.


You said yes cause it was an excellent plan for Turkey and the TC's. Name me one compromise you made on the Annan Plan. And the only president anyone insuulted here my friend Halil is Tpap...Talat is just a leader of a community.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby paliometoxo » Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:20 pm

rubbish north cyprus cant handle the pressure so they try scare us and say th eisland may be split forever... turkey cant keep supporting north cy forever they will cave eventually how many billions per month? talat is so full of shit
User avatar
paliometoxo
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8837
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: Nicosia, paliometocho

Postby paliometoxo » Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:23 pm

the new president of uk whats his position on cyprus?
User avatar
paliometoxo
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8837
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: Nicosia, paliometocho

Postby 74LB » Wed Aug 22, 2007 8:49 pm

DT. wrote:
halil wrote:we, majority of the TC's are supporting Talat .
We were the only ones who said YES for unification.
İf u are thinking we are going to be second class in our own country. leak your fingers ....... stop insulting our president.


You said yes cause it was an excellent plan for Turkey and the TC's. Name me one compromise you made on the Annan Plan. And the only president anyone insuulted here my friend Halil is Tpap...Talat is just a leader of a community.


Maybe the TC's said Yes because they wanted a solution ? And you cannot seriously tell me that every single item in the plan was in favour of the TC's ?

If this is the case, then you should line up all your negotiators and shoot them ..............
























only joking about the shooting bit :lol:
74LB
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:16 pm
Location: UK

Postby DT. » Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:15 pm

'74LondonBoy wrote:
DT. wrote:
halil wrote:we, majority of the TC's are supporting Talat .
We were the only ones who said YES for unification.
İf u are thinking we are going to be second class in our own country. leak your fingers ....... stop insulting our president.


You said yes cause it was an excellent plan for Turkey and the TC's. Name me one compromise you made on the Annan Plan. And the only president anyone insuulted here my friend Halil is Tpap...Talat is just a leader of a community.


Maybe the TC's said Yes because they wanted a solution ? And you cannot seriously tell me that every single item in the plan was in favour of the TC's ?

If this is the case, then you should line up all your negotiators and shoot them ..............
























only joking about the shooting bit :lol:


it was a one-sided affair...Tpap didn't negotiate it properly, wasn't allowed to....i don't know and it doesn;'t matter now....what does matter is that the Turkish side did not concede ONE point....
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Bananiot » Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:22 pm

Mustn't forget that it was Papadopoulos who sent an urgent letter to Koffee Annan in December 2003 begging him for a solution plan because "if Cyprus was to enter the EU without the problem solved we would be heading for europartition".

Of course he was gambling on Denktash to reject the plan (as he did) but by the time of the referendum Talat was calling the shots in the north. Papadopoulos bluffed and he lost and we are suffering for this. Many Greek Cypriots are beginning to realise this at last and in a panic, Papadopoulos has asked from lackeys to start throwing punches below the waste and thus, anyone who is against him is now branded as a Turk who speaks with a Greek voice. This man has taken us decades back and those that cannot see this are simply playing willingly his anachronistic game that may save him but will undoubtedly mean the end of Cyprus.

P.S. It is not true that Turkey did not concede a point. For a start the army would leave in a given space of time bar 350 soldiers. Then Famagusta along with Morphou would have been returned to their lawful inhabitants together with some 40 or so villages. Now doubt, the next plan will be worse, but of course we will not accept it, just as we rejected all plans since 1959. We prefer the situation to remain as it is because we are fools enough to believe that in due course the balance of power will change in our favour.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby zan » Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:37 pm

DT. wrote:
'74LondonBoy wrote:
DT. wrote:
halil wrote:we, majority of the TC's are supporting Talat .
We were the only ones who said YES for unification.
?f u are thinking we are going to be second class in our own country. leak your fingers ....... stop insulting our president.


You said yes cause it was an excellent plan for Turkey and the TC's. Name me one compromise you made on the Annan Plan. And the only president anyone insuulted here my friend Halil is Tpap...Talat is just a leader of a community.


Maybe the TC's said Yes because they wanted a solution ? And you cannot seriously tell me that every single item in the plan was in favour of the TC's ?

If this is the case, then you should line up all your negotiators and shoot them ..............
























only joking about the shooting bit :lol:


it was a one-sided affair...Tpap didn't negotiate it properly, wasn't allowed to....i don't know and it doesn;'t matter now....what does matter is that the Turkish side did not concede ONE point....



Kifeas spent days telling me that TPap did not have time to negotiate the Annan Plan. He said that the UN did not give him enough time...Of course I convinced Kifeas that TPap simply did not give it enough of his time full stop :wink: so I am afraid your analysis of the situation is completely wrong DT. Just trying to blame it all on us as usual :roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby humanist » Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:37 pm

hallil, the understanding of the referendum was that no community was expected to say yes or no. You said yes because you felt there would have been possitive benefits for your community the GC's said no because they did not feel that. Go right ahead support Talat who has so far proven to be a partitionsist. This makes you statement hypocritical in that really what you supported back in 2004 was not the Anan Plan but a partition plan. So unification and Anana Plan do not go together, it is an oximoron. Congratulations on your yes vote. Once again GC's are to blame. May be if you or your leader Mr Talat (liar) could come up with a trully unifying plan for our country people will actually vote yes throughout the country and you will have unification. The reality is Turkey keeps telling you what to so, feeds you lies to wait till se secures membership and then you will create your own country based on lies and stolen land of my country. This is not going to happen dude. Do you think that Cyprus has the power to stop the aid to trash can, I don't think so the reason you have not gotten aid and direct trade is because the EU does not want to give it. since 77 or whatever it was the plan fo cyprus is based on a federation with two states and untl that is presented the EU and RoC will not accept anything

Stop being such victims of always blaoming the RoC and start acting like you do want unification and it will come and you weill share in the wealth that you claim other cypriot cousins are sharing/

Furthrmore, you blames TP for not meeting with your leader, may be your leader is Ankara and that is what TP is doing dealing with the people who rule the roost. get rid of the Turkish occupation forces and then pershasp we could be talking unification, the harsh answer tot this is that you cannot get rid of the turkish occupation forces.,
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests