Viewpoint wrote:Nikitas wrote:Bir makes sense, as always.
No matter what the division and the foreign interference, the two communities always built bridges, even during the worst days of the intercommunal strife of the 60s. Now we see those bridges in the form of thousands of people who come south every day to work.
Moving into a fair society, where there is equality of status, and more important equality of opportunity (importand for all individuals not just TCs), is now easier because of the EU and its overriding provisions that take precedence over the Cyprus constitution. And also the remedies available, in European courts, which would not permit any of the past bullshit.
There will be small minorities in each community who will not relinquish their clinging to their ethnic background. Maybe for those diehards we could set aside small areas of ethnic purity, on in the north and one in the south, and in time these would become theme parks of the past.
As for the language thing, which I see as a possible obstacle, every Cypriot could be taught to understand, not speak, the other's language. There is a precedent for this, when engineers building the Concord plane back int he 60s were taught to understand French and English respectively. The plane is more complex than any project we are likely to face in daily life in Cyprus, and it got built and it works so we can conclude the engineers understood each other fairly well.
In a European society of the 21st century respect for the individual, and his uniquequness, is paramount and that should be the starting point for a Cyprus solution. Naturally the Turkish Cypriot community needs some minimum guarantees as a community, but not in the limiting form of the past. To give an example, the provision in the Constitution is that the president of the republic must be Greek Cypriot. Why not just Cypriot? And let the matter be decided by the voters themselves and the social situation prevailing at the time. It is conceivable that at some future point Cypriots would decide that the best person for the job is not a Greek Cypriot- and I think that this kind of situation is what Bir is talking about and one most of us Cypriots would like to see in the future. Where we judge the quality of the individual and not his nationality. Something we do in our daily routines now no matter where we live.
Why do you not sound sincere and why do I not trust what you say, is it because you are comfortable knowing your are the 80% and I am 20% and that GCs (and TCs) are mainly racists to a degree that they would rather vote in a monkey than have a TC as president. Judging from this forum GCs have not matured one iota from the 1960 and still want to force their domination on us reducing us to minority status rather than the community partnership as per the 1960 agreements, knowing all this would you throw yourself at the mercy of GCs and an imbalance of 80% who if not openly but psychologically still seek revenge for the past losses?
Can see what your concern is VP, however it makes little difference to you one way or another. All plans have called for a GC president, so you'd have that anyway. What Nikitas is saying why a GC president, make it a Cypriot. I believe a TC candidate would bend over backwards for the GC's anyway just to prove to the world he would not be biased. Compared to Christofias and Papadopoulos if there were a viable option of a TC candidate I would vote for him/her.