iceman wrote:Tim Drayton wrote:I am surprised that this thread still has any mileage left in it, but I would like to reply to these points.
I was deliberately provocative in both my choice of title for the thread and in the way I worded my first post. I don’t really apologise for this – we have crossed the forty page mark and I think this approach has helped to attract attention to the issue.
I can’t help touching on a point that was raised with reference to my first post. I was informed that, according to “Minor Atrocities of the Twentieth Century” the casualty figures for Cyprus were, for example, in (1955-59):
Turkish Cypriots: 84
Greek Cypriots: 278
Tim Drayton,
I am surprised a man of your knowledge can make such a wrong observation..
During the period you mention (1955-59) the clash was between EOKA & the British administration,NOT GC against TC!!...
How can you blame the Turkish side for the 278 GC loses when they (GC's) were fighting the British for independence and Enosis?
It was unfortunate that the British recruited some TC's to the police force to defend their position and GC's retaliated by killing civilian TC's..
The intercommunal violence between the two communities (TC & the GC) started December 1963..
I agree. I was tryıng to respond to a lenghty post in which a large number of figures were quoted and ıt would have been more logıcal to take the figures that had been given for the sixties (although the particular event I quoted from O'Malley and Craig's book did take place in the 50's and was clearly a case of inter-ethnic strife, so at least SOME of these deaths stemmed from intercommunal violence). I stand by main argument that nothing will be achieved by endlessly arguing about which side suffered greater losses. But you are right to criticise me on this point and I stand corrected.