erolz wrote:the_snake_and_the_crane wrote: No thats a very elaborate answer to your post Erolz.
Even if you say so yourself
You / Kifeas argue that the defintion of expansionsit is a specific certain kind of expansion, defined by opinion, perspective and many other subjective variables.
I define expansionist in a purely objective / scientific way that means how much something has expanded.
Not elaborate. Not needing pages of waffle, just a pure and simple objective defintion of expansionist.
Okay Erol, I didn't realise that in a political forum like this you might have been referring to or in fact talking about chemistry and physics! My fault for thinking that when here we use terms and notions, we should also put them in a political perspective! I only tried to approach the issue from the modern international political connotation perspective of the term expansionism, which is more often used in association with imperialism or neo-colonialism. My stupidity!
