Pyrpolizer wrote:erolz wrote:From the end of WW2 the previously unitary germany was divided in to two seperate states in every physical and legal sense possible to imagine. Before this neither the FGR or the DDR existed. With renuification the former DDR was legaly incorporated INTO the FGR and what existed afterwards was an EXPANDED FGR. It is all very plain and simple really, just try taking it in slow steps and have a rest inbetween them and you might just get it.
Are you still unable to see the fallacy of your definition of expansion as just meaning growing larger,which might or might not be illegal as opposed to reunification which is always legal?
erolz wrote:Exactly my point. YOU may well and frequently do talk about expansion without qualifiaction or quotation marks and mean such a narrow , massively subjective and subject to point of view meaning for the word but such unqualifed use in this way is on the whole little more than rhetoric compared to the simple objective defination I give.
We are actually talking for the expansion of Turkey on the expense of Cyprus remember?
What forbits this form of expansion are numerous UN resolutions like the UN definition of agggression, the one adopting the International law for friendly relations among states and possibly many others.
Here are some links:
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/3314.htm
http://www.hku.edu/law/conlawhk/conlaw/ ... 4/2625.htm
Just quoting a small part
(a) The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use of force of the territory of another State or part thereof,
Do you mean the TRNC/KKTC. Rauf Raif Denktas did that and not Turkey.....God bless the man...
Thankyou......Some good news and some bad on my illness but we shall see.
