Ruserious wrote:I think everyone should buy a Jeep Wrangler - great for pavement parking in Cyprus and it's the Greenest car on the planet
http://www.independent.co.uk/living/mot ... 959451.ece
Isn't it strange? Researching back this twaddle leads one to CNW Marketing Research, an American bullshitmonger. How do I know this? Because their web site clearly states
Clients include major automobile manufacturers...
Now, who is going to bite the hand that feeds them? These guys have a vested interest in the US car industry. They are therefore not independent and they are going to knock the Japanese in any distorted way they can.
OK let's apply their logic. According to the Wrangler specs, the weight of the Wrangler is 4390 lbs or 1991 kg. 80% of the energy is used in manufacture, clearly proportional to weight. So the energy used in making the Jeep is .8x1991 = 1593 units. The energy use in making my 1310 kg Civic Hybrid = 1048 units. So which is greener? If you look at their so-called Dust-to-dust report, you can see they make all sorts of assumptions, such as the average lifetimes of vehicles in years, to two decimal places, if you please and average miles to death. It is sheer coincidence that Japanese cars and hybrids, in particular, have shorter lifetimes and fewer miles than US-made cars. Yet many Japanese cars are known to have extreme longevity, but that is ignored (just look at the average age of Japanese pickups on the Cyprus roads!). The peak of hypocrisy is that the average miles at death of my car is given as lower than the guarantee limit mileage!!!!!
Go to the Larnace or Akrotiri salt lakes and take a good shovelful of the stuff before believing this report. A pinch is insufficient. If you care to Google it, you can find many articles refuting the report, many of them American.