bigOz wrote:cypezokyli wrote:When mass graves of TC civilians - mainly elderly people, women and children were discovered in no less than 3 villages few miles from Famagusta - a repeat and reminder of what was happening during 1963-67 era - the whole operation now had a new purpose. To secure an area of land where TCs can be safely kept. This was encouraged more so by tens of thousands of refugees from Limassol and Paphos region, most of them who had left all their earthly posessions to live in tents in the safety of British sovereign bases.
this argument would have been correct assuming that the three villages were attacked before the second phase of the invasion.
check your dates
as far as i know the three villages were attacked AFTER the second phase. in this respect this argument has no basis.
in this respect the question of kikapu and halil still remains unanswered
1.why Turkey didn't just restore "Law and Order" after kicking Sampson out ?
1.why Turkey didn't put Dr Fazil Kucuk as a president of the Cyprus by taking whole of the Cyprus ? till restore "Law and Order"
I have checked my dates cypezokyli and below might help you understand why you might be wrong. I cannot get internet links for these because they do not exist in the internet file archives (most newspapers started to keep them after 1990s and some might have copies dating back another 5 years or so but nothing original for 1974). However I am supplying you with the names and dates of the relevant newspapers so feel free to prove me a liar, if you like to contact and check with them first:
- On 23rd July 1974 the Washington Post - also Times, Guardian, 23rd July 1974 reported "In a Greek raid on a small Turkish village near Limassol 36 people out of a population of 200 were killed. The Greeks said that they had been given orders to kill the inhabitants of the Turkish villages before the Turkish forces arrived."
- UN Committee on Missing Persons (CMP): On 6 December 2002, excavations at the village of Alaminos, led to the discovery of human remains, which according to existing testimonies, belonged to Turkish Cypriots who lost their lives during a fire exchange with a unit of the National Guard, on 20 July 1974.
- On 24th July 1974 France Soir reported: "The Greeks burned Turkish mosques and set fire to Turkish homes in the villages around Famagusta. Defenceless Turkish villagers who have no weapons live in an atmosphere of terror and they evacuated their homes and go and live in tents in the forests. The Greeks' actions are a shame to humanity."
- The German newspaper Die Zeit wrote on 30 August 1974: the massacre of Turkish Cypriots in Paphos and Famagusta is the proof of how justified the Turks were to undertaken their (August) intervention.
The fact that the actual location of the mass graves in Famagusta were discovered after the second invasion is often misleadingly used to imply that no one was aware of what happened beforehand. Everyone knew there was a destruction of Turkish villages and inhabitants in those areas. For example, as when Soir reported the destruction of the Turkish villages in Famagusta area (in July), because the evidence was buried, they thought the inhabitants were hiding in nearby woodlands or whatever. Nevertheless it was clear to everyone that Turkish vilages were under attack prior to August 1974.
The three villages were not attacked after the second phase of the invasion but long before. The decomposing bodies of the victims were also a testimony to the fact that the attacks were not recent! Furthermore, if you care to use some logic: the second phase of the invasion lasted around two days - I believe it started on 14th August before a cease-fire was declared on 16th. Do you seriously believe that in the face of the advancing tanks to the area on the first day, the fleeing National guard were so foolish, they spent many hours gathering up civilians in various villages and shooting them, before using earth diggers to dig huge holes for mass graves and burying them? And repeating the same in three villages? I promise you there was no one in sight by lunchtime the first day of the second phase. Turkish tanks just advanced into Famagusta unopposed and with almost no resistance because everyone had long been gone.
i am sorry , i though that you were reffering to the sandalari case.
but from the above, the same thing is again proven
attacks on the tcs were provoked by the turkish invasion.
and the attacks you mention happened so long there was fighting.
was there ever a possibility, that turkey would attack and the gcs would not have attacked tcs ? !!!
When the invasion started, Ecevit made it very clear in the international media that the military action was to restore the Republic's status, it was not aimed at the GCs, and under the circumstances it was to ensure the safety of all inhabitants of Cyprus - not just the TCs. During the invasion leaflets were dropped from air to that effect, explaining the Turkey's intentions and for GCs to lay down their arms - guaranteeing they would be treated with respect and dignity. These were dropped on an island already occupied by UN-F-CYP who also read them, hence they could not have been a bluff. A copy of one was displayed by iceman in another thread couple of months ago.
Having made their intentions clear and expecting no resistance from the locals, the landing forces headed for one of the least favourable and most defended beach heads, few miles West of Kyrenia. This was the start of things going wrong and the whole invasion process turning into something else.
let me tell you how this sounds to me
before the invasion in iraq, the bush goverment called the press and told them of their good intentions (destroying WMDs, destroying the links with al quada..... removing a dictator....etc).
ofcource the US made it clear that it had no intentions to harm innocent civilians.
As a proof off that the US airforce before they attacked they threw leafleats, prooving their good intentions..... because, as we all very well know leaflets thrown by an airforce, at times of war, always reflect the truth and are never propaganda.
having made their intentions clear, they were surprised that some people resisted. i mean, when the attacking army repeatetly states its good intentions, it should expect that noone would resist. as a consequence the whole invasion turned to something else....
I hope you understand my problem.