Cyprus-Forum.com

[simonwjones]

Who would you say is the most nastiest member of recent times?

[denizaksulu]

Who would you say is the most nastiest member of recent times?

Oh nooooo!

[Get Real!]

Who would you say is the most nastiest member of recent times?

There's no such thing in the English language as "most nastiest" because the word "nastiest" already means the "most nastiest"!

[alexISS]

Who would you say is the most nastiest member of recent times?

There's no such thing in the English language as "most nastiest" because the word "nastiest" already means the "most nastiest"!

Well at least we know who the most spasharhidikal member is... yes, it's you GetReal! Oh I'm sorry, is that proper english?

[Get Real!]

Who would you say is the most nastiest member of recent times?

There's no such thing in the English language as "most nastiest" because the word "nastiest" already means the "most nastiest"!

Well at least we know who the most spasharhidikal member is... yes, it's you GetReal! Oh I'm sorry, is that proper english?

Is that the fine ancient art of testicle bursting?

[alexISS]

Who would you say is the most nastiest member of recent times?

There's no such thing in the English language as "most nastiest" because the word "nastiest" already means the "most nastiest"!

Well at least we know who the most spasharhidikal member is... yes, it's you GetReal! Oh I'm sorry, is that proper english?

Is that the fine ancient art of testicle bursting?

That's the one...

[simonwjones]

Who would you say is the most nastiest member of recent times?

There's no such thing in the English language as "most nastiest" because the word "nastiest" already means the "most nastiest"!

Remove the smart remarks and answer my question

[Get Real!]

Who would you say is the most nastiest member of recent times?

There's no such thing in the English language as "most nastiest" because the word "nastiest" already means the "most nastiest"!

Remove the smart remarks and answer my question

Ok!

Nasty, Spiteful, Malicious, Vicious, they're all the same really...

IMHO, there is only one member that fits the description to a "T" but it's not a good idea to hurt their feelings by advertising it here.

[Filitsa]

Dear Mr. Get Real!,

I've read some posts in which you engage in the unsolicted critiquing of the English language usage of certain members of this forum, particularly those for whom English is not their first language. Consequently, I've gathered that you take pride in your mastery of the language. With this in mind and with all due respect, permit me to point out a matter of incorrect pronoun-antecedent agreement in number in your sentence quoted below.

"IMHO, there is only one member that fits the description to a "T" but it's not a good idea to hurt their feelings by advertising it here."

"Member" is the antecedent noun to the plural pronoun "their." "Member" is a singular noun. Therefore, its corresponding pronoun should be singular, not plural. Correct usage would include "his," "her," or "his/her."

Additionally, a noun is a person, place, thing, idea, or event. Whereas "member" is a noun that falls into the person category, the subordinating conjunction "that," which refers to a thing, should be corrected to the interrogative pronoun "who," which refers to a person.

A comma is also required before the coordinating conjuction "but" because it joins in one sentence two complete thoughts who could otherwise stand alone as sentences.

I hope this lesson is of benefit to you. I provide it, of course, with the best of intentions.

Regards.

[Simon]

TOLD!!!!