This is the set of 13 proposals Makarios made to improve the newly formed Cyprus constitution.
http://www.cyprus-conflict.net/13_points.htm
the_snake_and_the_crane wrote:Is this the supposed plan to exterminate Turkish Cypriots from the island? lol
In a speech on 4th September 1962, at Panayia, Makarios actually said “Until this Turkish community forming part of the Turkish race which has been the terrible enemy of Hellenism is expelled, the duty of the heroes of EOKA can never be considered as terminated."
Article 173 of the Constitution provided that separate municipalities be established for Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots. The Greek Cypriots refused to obey this provision, so the Turkish Cypriots took the matter to the Supreme Constitutional Court of Cyprus.
In February 1963 (Cyprus Mail 12.2.63) Archbishop Makarios declared on behalf of the Greek Cypriots that if the Court ruled against them they would ignore it. On 25th April 1963 the Court did rule against them and they did ignore it. The neutral President of the Court (a German citizen) resigned and the rule of law in Cyprus collapsed.
Christmas 1963 the Greek Cypriot militia attacked Turkish Cypriot communities across the island, and very many men, women and children were killed. On 2nd January 1964 the Daily Telegraph wrote "The Greek Cypriot community should not assume that the British military presence can or should secure them against Turkish intervention if they persecute the Turkish Cypriots. We must not be a shelter for double-crossers."
bigOz wrote:Now that we have seen the GR comedy show - let us look at the realities of what actually happened:
In a speech on 4th September 1962, at Panayia, Makarios actually said “Until this Turkish community forming part of the Turkish race which has been the terrible enemy of Hellenism is expelled, the duty of the heroes of EOKA can never be considered as terminated."
I do not think there is any need to quote anything further. I hope now everyone knows where to stick the 13 constitutional changes Makarios proposed!
Bananiot wrote:Besides, you cannot go back on your signature, hardly before the ink had time to dry out.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest