The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


65 BUCKS APIECE.

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Postby Get Real! » Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:43 pm

Southerner wrote:You justify the everyday slaughter in Iraq of men women and children by suicide bombers, blaming it on the west, wow what logic, "we've been invaded let's kill our fellow countrymen".

Are you denying or ignoring that the US/UK are applying the "divide and rule" tactic to enforce their will on Iraq?

Which of these two shortcomings are you suffering from that keeps you from placing any blame on the US/UK?
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Southerner » Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:51 pm

Get Real! wrote:Are you denying or ignoring that the US/UK are applying the "divide and rule" tactic to enforce their will on Iraq?


Divide and rule what?

What great logic, "I feel so divided, I need some unifying therapy, I know I'll go and kill some fellow Iraqis"
User avatar
Southerner
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: UK/Paphos soon

Postby Southerner » Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:52 pm

Southerner wrote:
Get Real! wrote:Are you denying or ignoring that the US/UK are applying the "divide and rule" tactic to enforce their will on Iraq?
Purveyor of fine porkies since 1571


Divide and rule what?

What great logic, "I feel so divided, I need some unifying therapy, I know I'll go and kill some fellow Iraqis"
User avatar
Southerner
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: UK/Paphos soon

Postby Get Real! » Thu Aug 09, 2007 12:00 am

Southerner wrote:
Get Real! wrote:Are you denying or ignoring that the US/UK are applying the "divide and rule" tactic to enforce their will on Iraq?


Divide and rule what?

What great logic, "I feel so divided, I need some unifying therapy, I know I'll go and kill some fellow Iraqis"

You have answered my question... that'll be all thank you. :)
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Chimera » Thu Aug 09, 2007 12:29 am

Perhaps the reason the U.K. supported the invasion in 1974 (sitting back was effectively supporting) by Turkey, was that they were hoping to
"bury the bad news" that they couldn't pay the rent for their bases. :oops:
Chimera
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:29 pm
Location: U.K., Cyprus, Greece & France

Postby The Microphone » Thu Aug 09, 2007 12:36 am

Chimera wrote:Perhaps the reason the U.K. supported the invasion in 1974 (sitting back was effectively supporting) by Turkey, was that they were hoping to
"bury the bad news" that they couldn't pay the rent for their bases. :oops:


Sorry mate but if your statement was half correct...you'd be living in a Turkish controlled Island. Yes? (PS....not saying I agree with the invasion or anything approaching it. Just wanted to make that clear)
The Microphone
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 352
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 2:19 pm

Postby Chimera » Thu Aug 09, 2007 12:45 am

The Microphone wrote:
Chimera wrote:Perhaps the reason the U.K. supported the invasion in 1974 (sitting back was effectively supporting) by Turkey, was that they were hoping to
"bury the bad news" that they couldn't pay the rent for their bases. :oops:


Sorry mate but if your statement was half correct...you'd be living in a Turkish controlled Island. Yes? (PS....not saying I agree with the invasion or anything approaching it. Just wanted to make that clear)


You are effectively admitting that it would be the sort of thing the U.K. would do then, if they couldn't pay the rent?
Chimera
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:29 pm
Location: U.K., Cyprus, Greece & France

Postby Southerner » Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:00 am

Chimera wrote:
The Microphone wrote:
Chimera wrote:Perhaps the reason the U.K. supported the invasion in 1974 (sitting back was effectively supporting) by Turkey, was that they were hoping to
"bury the bad news" that they couldn't pay the rent for their bases. :oops:


Sorry mate but if your statement was half correct...you'd be living in a Turkish controlled Island. Yes? (PS....not saying I agree with the invasion or anything approaching it. Just wanted to make that clear)


You are effectively admitting that it would be the sort of thing the U.K. would do then, if they couldn't pay the rent?

Now here's someone really putting words in your mouth
User avatar
Southerner
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: UK/Paphos soon

Postby Chimera » Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:07 am

Just logical deduction really.

I was slighlty playing devil's advocate. :wink:

But, the reality is that the U.K was struggling with the payments at the time (3 day week, power cuts, strikes etc).

No smoke without fire. :D
Chimera
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:29 pm
Location: U.K., Cyprus, Greece & France

Postby Southerner » Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:10 am

Chimera wrote:Perhaps the reason the U.K. supported the invasion in 1974 (sitting back was effectively supporting) by Turkey, was that they were hoping to "bury the bad news" that they couldn't pay the rent for their bases. :oops:

Shortly before I was stationed in Cyprus in 1966 the UK which had been keeping the peace even though it was no longer the UKs responsibilty as the country was now independent served notice on the the UN that it was no longer going to be 'Pig in the middle'.
After the UN deployment it was not the resposibility of the UK to keep the peace or prevent/repulse the Turkish Invasion (according to you it couldn't afford to do so anyway so make up your mind). UK military prescence was purely fixed to the SBAs where my landlady was very happy to be employed..
User avatar
Southerner
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 911
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 7:32 pm
Location: UK/Paphos soon

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests