The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Turkish aim for partition plays the UN on and on

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Turkish aim for partition plays the UN on and on

Postby humanist » Sat Aug 04, 2007 3:29 am

http://www.cyprusweekly.com.cy/default. ... geID=304_3

"Marcoullis should accept as soon as possible the realities on the island. Turkish Cypriots will not wait for ever. We will do our utmost to upgrade our state," the spokesman added. The Foreign Minister repeated the government’s commitment to the implementation of the July 8 accord.


I like the way the Turkish Cypriots do not take responsibility for what they really want and they play games. The reality is they are going for partition and under no circumstance shold the RoC believe or accept anything else.

The Roc infact ought to try and get econmoic embargoes on Turkey as well as the trnc.

I also like the way they say our State. They forget to mention Manolis' and Costas State in that.
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

Re: Turkish aim for partition plays the UN on and on

Postby MR-from-NG » Sat Aug 04, 2007 3:40 am

humanist wrote:http://www.cyprusweekly.com.cy/default.aspx?FrontPageID=304_3

"Marcoullis should accept as soon as possible the realities on the island. Turkish Cypriots will not wait for ever. We will do our utmost to upgrade our state," the spokesman added. The Foreign Minister repeated the government’s commitment to the implementation of the July 8 accord.


I like the way the Turkish Cypriots do not take responsibility for what they really want and they play games. The reality is they are going for partition and under no circumstance shold the RoC believe or accept anything else.

The Roc infact ought to try and get econmoic embargoes on Turkey as well as the trnc.

I also like the way they say our State. They forget to mention Manolis' and Costas State in that.



Piratis wrote:
You started the killings, so I don't see how you can complain because you also had a few 100s of losses when you killed 1000s.

mr wrote
Piratis, have you no shame? Do you think you are fooling people by making such sick statements. The facts are there. You attacked us in late December of 63 with the intention of wiping us all out.

Are you serious when you say "you started it" or are you just winding us up?

Piratis wrote
You are the shameless. And you are in fact not fooling anybody. Or you need more than 33 years to realize that nobody is buying your excuses?



You started the conflict in 63 (and not only), and in the conflict that followed both communities had an about equal number of victims. Thats the fact, and your lies will get you nowhere.

If Piratis is representative for the majority of GCs then I say fuck off to reunification. And yes partition is the only workable solution.
MR-from-NG
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:58 pm

Postby zan » Sat Aug 04, 2007 3:45 am

You read it with your newly found warped mind but the reality is different.

"Marcoullis should accept as soon as possible the realities on the island. Turkish Cypriots will not wait for ever. We will do our utmost to upgrade our state," the spokesman added. The Foreign Minister repeated the government’s commitment to the implementation of the July 8 accord.



That statement alone says "Otherwise". They are still trying to find a solution and the "RoC" stalling tactics are not going to work anymore. Either give us our rights in full or face the consequences. We cannot wait for ever. Enough is enough.
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby Chimera » Sat Aug 04, 2007 4:03 am

Tee hee hee. :lol:

You've had enough already :roll:

Has Turkey got prepared for the return of the whingeing prodigals. :P
Chimera
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 285
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:29 pm
Location: U.K., Cyprus, Greece & France

Postby pitsilos » Sat Aug 04, 2007 4:09 am

zan wrote: Either give us our rights in full or face the consequences.


what rights zan?
pitsilos
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1846
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:04 am

Postby humanist » Sat Aug 04, 2007 4:12 am

he cannot answer that because he knows his rights are respected. consequenses, we are facing the consequences half our country is under occupation which he supports fully.
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

Postby MR-from-NG » Sat Aug 04, 2007 4:16 am

humanist wrote:he cannot answer that because he knows his rights are respected. consequenses, we are facing the consequences half our country is under occupation which he supports fully.


Humanist, you and Pitsilos should be stand-up comedians. You would make an excellent double act.

As for our rights, we'll let the international community decide if they are indeed respected as you would like to believe.
MR-from-NG
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:58 pm

Postby zan » Sat Aug 04, 2007 4:17 am

humanist wrote:he cannot answer that because he knows his rights are respected. consequenses, we are facing the consequences half our country is under occupation which he supports fully.


Is that right. Are you willing to give us our rights as to the 1960 Constitution in full or not!!? What I support is the right thing and not the surrender that you want. If you are foolish enough not to see that then that is not my fault.
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby pitsilos » Sat Aug 04, 2007 4:23 am

I have no problem to returnimg to the 1960 agreements...as long as you respect my right to reside on my own ancestral land under the 1960 agreements...DEAL?...as much as you would like too, you can't have it both ways zan... :lol:

Mrfromng I don't know as to why you took offence to me asking zan what rights he was talking about...don't tell me you are starting to see sublime messages in ice cube as well? :lol:
pitsilos
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1846
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:04 am

Postby MR-from-NG » Sat Aug 04, 2007 4:26 am

pitsilos wrote:I have no problem to returnimg to the 1960 agreements...as long as you respect my right to reside on my own ancestral land under the 1960 agreements...DEAL?...as much as you would like too, you can't have it both ways zan... :lol:

Mrfromng I don't know as to why you took offence to me asking zan what rights he was talking about...don't tell me you are starting to see sublime messages in ice cube as well? :lol:


:lol: :lol:
I thought I detected a touch of sarcasm in your question mate. I must be tired and ready for bed now :wink: :wink:

Goodnight to you all.
MR-from-NG
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3440
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:58 pm

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Maxx_truch and 0 guests