Cyprus-Forum.com

[zan]

Part Turkish owned land??????WHere did you hear that Zan?

I meant Turkish Cypriot in the context that I wrote it DT and well you know it. Or is that what you are disputing??

There's a big difference between the 2 Zan. Although i still don't get how you can claim that either. You don't consider the 1960 constitution worthy of toilet paper, yet you flag it up everytime you want to claim that one part of this paper you agree with. TO hell with the rest of it?

When did I ever make that claim????The constitution was fine for its time and should have been allowed to function by Makarios. The point you are trying to make otherwise I don't really get.

[DT.]

Part Turkish owned land??????WHere did you hear that Zan?

I meant Turkish Cypriot in the context that I wrote it DT and well you know it. Or is that what you are disputing??

There's a big difference between the 2 Zan. Although i still don't get how you can claim that either. You don't consider the 1960 constitution worthy of toilet paper, yet you flag it up everytime you want to claim that one part of this paper you agree with. TO hell with the rest of it?

When did I ever make that claim????The constitution was fine for its time and should have been allowed to function by Makarios. The point you are trying to make otherwise I don't really get.

now worries Zan i meant something else and i think i know what your response would have been. Guess we've been arguing on this forum for too long about the same shit.

[zan]

Part Turkish owned land??????WHere did you hear that Zan?

I meant Turkish Cypriot in the context that I wrote it DT and well you know it. Or is that what you are disputing??

There's a big difference between the 2 Zan. Although i still don't get how you can claim that either. You don't consider the 1960 constitution worthy of toilet paper, yet you flag it up everytime you want to claim that one part of this paper you agree with. TO hell with the rest of it?

When did I ever make that claim????The constitution was fine for its time and should have been allowed to function by Makarios. The point you are trying to make otherwise I don't really get.

now worries Zan i meant something else and i think i know what your response would have been. Guess we've been arguing on this forum for too long about the same shit.

What is there to argue about???The leaders of the "RoC' are saying loud and clear that they want to Hellenise the island and we will not allow that. Let them Hellenise the south and leave us alone.. The refugees can be compensated and we can all get on with our lives. The rest is as you did in your post and that is to justify it by saying that the Turkish Generals said something different. Sorry mate..and I mean the sorry to people like you, and that is we cannot live life like that and we should not be expected to. As I have always said..The "RoC" has done nothing but bare minimum to make us feel part of it and has done everything possible to make us feel as if we do not belong. It is they that are claiming they represent even us so where are they doing that....

[Chimera]

Zan, apologies if you are seriously, genuinely disabled; but I've seen a number of posts where people have been trying to drum the truth into your head but you seem blind to their words.

Cyprus was, is and will always, be connected to Greece historically, therefore Hellenic. You cannot change that ...stop banging your head on a brick wall.

What Turkey wants to do is TURKIFY it.
Naaahhhh.....that doesn't sound as good as Hellenic does is???

[DT.]

Part Turkish owned land??????WHere did you hear that Zan?

I meant Turkish Cypriot in the context that I wrote it DT and well you know it. Or is that what you are disputing??

There's a big difference between the 2 Zan. Although i still don't get how you can claim that either. You don't consider the 1960 constitution worthy of toilet paper, yet you flag it up everytime you want to claim that one part of this paper you agree with. TO hell with the rest of it?

When did I ever make that claim????The constitution was fine for its time and should have been allowed to function by Makarios. The point you are trying to make otherwise I don't really get.

now worries Zan i meant something else and i think i know what your response would have been. Guess we've been arguing on this forum for too long about the same shit.

What is there to argue about???The leaders of the "RoC' are saying loud and clear that they want to Hellenise the island and we will not allow that. Let them Hellenise the south and leave us alone.. The refugees can be compensated and we can all get on with our lives. The rest is as you did in your post and that is to justify it by saying that the Turkish Generals said something different. Sorry mate..and I mean the sorry to people like you, and that is we cannot live life like that and we should not be expected to. As I have always said..The "RoC" has done nothing but bare minimum to make us feel part of it and has done everything possible to make us feel as if we do not belong. It is they that are claiming they represent even us so where are they doing that....

But where do they say that they want to Hellenise the island??

[zan]

Oh! Come off it DT...We have discussed what TPap and others have said before. You are just hanging on by your finger nails.

[Pyrpolizer]

The prosperity of Cypriot Hellenism Zan, means the prosperity of that part of the population of Cyprus which is Hellenic. The motherlands see us as extension of their own Greekness or Turkishness. Nothing wrong with that as long as we see ourselves as ethnic Greeks and Turks of the CYPRIOT NATION.

I hope one day comes that we might be able to tell the Turkish or Greek Politicians who come to Cyprus and make speaches "hey how about prosperity of the CYPRIOT NATION instead"/

Similar statements like that of Papoulias were made hundreds of times at the Occupied by Turkish politicians, but.... nobody of us jumped up as if pinched by a scorpion

[Murataga]

I hope one day comes that we might be able to tell the Turkish or Greek Politicians who come to Cyprus and make speaches "hey how about prosperity of the CYPRIOT NATION instead"/

I partly agree (hoping that we`ll have politicians visiting and wishing all Cypriots well one day) and I partly don`t (about the accusation that TCs and the GCs being a nation). Unfortunately, I seriously doubt that day will come before the large-scale Greek-Turkish conflict ends, but my fingers are crossed. Nevertheless, I applaud your good-will.

Similar statements like that of Papoulias were made hundreds of times at the Occupied by Turkish politicians, but.... nobody of us jumped up as if pinched by a scorpion

There is nothing wrong with the prosperity of the Cypriot Hellenism. The problem arises when a guy calls himself the president of Cyprus (and of all the Cypriots) yet ventures into defending, promoting, struggling and most importantly negotiating for the interests of Hellenism of Cyprus (Cypriot Hellenism) with that very title. It is not his job, nor is he entitled to do so. Turkish politicians wishing well for Turkish Cypriots never made accusations that the TC president represents or is entitled to the whole island or all her people. There is a huge difference.

[RAFAELLA]

@ DT
Waste of time DT...waste of time. If you were talking to a wall you would have better resutls

They are accusing RoC in every given chance round-the-clock ....but they do hold proudly their RoC/EU passport and travel the world

Waste of time my friend.