zan wrote:Kikapu wrote:The more I think about this story, the more sense it's beginning to make. The fact that this story was buried on page 21, is because it really did not have anything newsworthy. Anytime there's a demonstration, you are going to have demonstrators banging on cars, shop windows, and so on. This Turkish family was at the wrong place at the wrong time. The fact that no body was hurt, was the reason why it never made any meaningful news. As for the police not doing anything, what were they suppose to do, when no one was physically attacked, other than their cars. I have been to few demonstrations in the past in San Francisco, and the only thing the police does, is to monitor the march and make sure the demonstrators stay on the route intended for them. Unless there are serious danger to anyone or property, they just stay at a distance and watch. I got the feeling, there was only one police officer there. Did the officer even see the car license number to determine to be a TC car?. Since the whole event happened very quickly and they were able to speed away, who was the police officer suppose to arrest from the group of 200 demonstrators.? Did the family in fact report the incident to any other police officer later on, to at least get a police report on the damages done to the car.? I'm sure the family were frightened by the whole experience, but no body was hurt.viewpoint wrote:I apologise for not quoting the report word for word
I want to say few things to VP now. He apologised for not writing everything word for word in what the report said. VP did not forget to tell us anything from the report. What VP did, he added to the report. There is a difference when making the claim, that it was not word for word. What VP did was to add fuel to the fire or cry out "fire" in a crowded theater. VP did the most unthinkable by using the words "beaten up". This is why most people could not believe the story, because it just did not add up, and VP sat there and never corrected it. It is these kinds of intentional and deliberate statements that stir up hatred and mistrust. I have come to know VP very well over time, and this just about fits his MO. VP owes everyone an apology for making false statement, and secondly not coming forward to clear it up, until the evidence was given to us by Iceman. VP's apology for not telling the story word for word is meaningless, because he did not delete anything from the story, he just added to it to make it a story. Sounds like he has been taking lessons from Fanos. VP did not make a mistake, he made a false report.
Lets see if VP does the correct thing and apologise to everyone on this board for making a false statement.
I am not picking on you Kiks but just taking this post as an example of what is going on.
First you guys tell VP he is lying about the attacks and now you want to quantify it as being a minor thing. Soldiers being killed in Iraq are not even making the front page any more and those that are being bombed and masacred by the yanks are not even being mentioned so your statement of where this article was published does not hold water I am afraid. Could it just have been an editorial decision that maybe even came from higher up?????????
You can keep ignoring the anger and the violence that will happen at every twist and turn of the "Cyprob" but it will not go away and it could end up blowing up in our faces. Tread carefully...Your agenda is a dangerous game to play.
viewpoint wrote:A family of TCs who went south on the 20//7 thinking they were safe and firm supporters of trusting GCs and reunification were beaten up and spat on by angry GCs, was this reported in your press?
viewpoint wrote:Kıbrıs Newspaper 21/7/2007 Page 22 Names Esra Yucedal,Tamer Yucedal and Mete Yucedal Attack took place on Makarios Avenue 20/7/2007 There were about 200 protestors The police were there but they did nothing.
Kikapu wrote:Why don't you scan the report and post it for us to see, if it's not available on the net..
Since you work with computers, this should be no trouble at all for you.
What you're saying may be true. I just want to know the exact translation on what had happened.
Welcome back Zan,
I do not have an agenda my friend, just wanted to get the facts straight. As you can see from above, I did not say VP was lying, just wanted to read the story on how it was translated, and sure enough, the translation by VP was embellished to say the least. Why are you not having a go at VP for injecting the words "beaten up", because had that happened, more than likely, it would have been in the GC median and no one would have questioned VP, and in fact, would have condemned the attack. One of the first things VP said on his initial post was, "did your GC press cover this crime" or something like that. Well, if the crime as described by VP never took place, then the press had no reason to cover it, hence the fact members did not get to read about it. A car getting banged on during a demonstration is hardly newsworthy, no matter who the occupants were. I'm almost certain, other cars got banged also, as the case is, in any demonstrations.
Please Zan, lets not bring Iraq into this equation, because it does not hold any water I'm afraid, as to why this story was buried on page 21. It was buried, because it did not have a meaningful news worthiness to it, and I believe the editor of the paper did the right thing, by placing it on page 21. Had the "beatings" occurred, I can assure you, it would have made page 2 if not page 1. Don't forget, the date was very symbolic to the story. VP just added words that never happened to "spice up" the story, that's all.