The more I think about this story, the more sense it's beginning to make. The fact that this story was buried on page 21, is because it really did not have anything newsworthy. Anytime there's a demonstration, you are going to have demonstrators banging on cars, shop windows, and so on. This Turkish family was at the wrong place at the wrong time. The fact that no body was hurt, was the reason why it never made any meaningful news. As for the police not doing anything, what were they suppose to do, when no one was physically attacked, other than their cars. I have been to few demonstrations in the past in San Francisco, and the only thing the police does, is to monitor the march and make sure the demonstrators stay on the route intended for them. Unless there are serious danger to anyone or property, they just stay at a distance and watch. I got the feeling, there was only one police officer there. Did the officer even see the car license number to determine to be a TC car?. Since the whole event happened very quickly and they were able to speed away, who was the police officer suppose to arrest from the group of 200 demonstrators.? Did the family in fact report the incident to any other police officer later on, to at least get a police report on the damages done to the car.? I'm sure the family were frightened by the whole experience, but no body was hurt.
viewpoint wrote:I apologise for not quoting the report word for word
I want to say few things to VP now. He apologised for not writing everything word for word in what the report said. VP did not forget to tell us anything from the report. What VP did, he added to the report. There is a difference when making the claim, that it was not word for word. What VP did was to add fuel to the fire or cry out "fire" in a crowded theater. VP did the most unthinkable by using the words "beaten up". This is why most people could not believe the story, because it just did not add up, and VP sat there and never corrected it. It is these kinds of intentional and deliberate statements that stir up hatred and mistrust. I have come to know VP very well over time, and this just about fits his MO. VP owes everyone an apology for making false statement, and secondly not coming forward to clear it up, until the evidence was given to us by Iceman. VP's apology for not telling the story word for word is meaningless, because he did not delete anything from the story, he just added to it to make it a story. Sounds like he has been taking lessons from Fanos. VP did not make a mistake, he made a false report.
Lets see if VP does the correct thing and apologise to everyone on this board for making a false statement.