Viewpoint wrote:PiratisIt is not bullshit at all Viewpoint. The 18% of TCs stole 36% of the land. We know very well that most TCs including you were given GC land. As we agreed later lets do a referendum on 18%-82% partition and lets see who will accept it and who will reject it. A poll done in the forum showed that mosts TCs would reject it since apparently all you say are excuses and all that really matters is how much land you will gain on our loss by brute force.
Its total bullshit just like suggesting I have GC land my land is TC land. You know how I voted so I dont have a problem with the 18% split but you have to prove where in the world the land distribution is eqauted to population percentages, I have asked you this before but of you could not answer becuase this is not the way it is done.
You are illegally occupying a sovereign country,
Im illegally occupying my own country do you know how comical you sound.The kinds of "BBF" that you accept are disguised partition with gains of land on our loss. If you want I will give you an example of BBF that we will accept without a problem.
Go ahead alway willing to consider level headed propositions.On the contrary what the UN, EU and the world rubber stamped is that the plan we rejected was in fact so bad that it is now null and void.
The solution we propose is not "GC style" but the style that any other democratic country in the world has. In fact I had proposed to you that Cyprus can have the constitution of any other of the 26 EU member states or even Turkey if you wish. Unfortunately you reject the models of all other democratic countries and you want to force in Cyprus what you want, which is something that suits you and only you and exists nowhere else in the whole world.
How about Serbia and Montenegro? Never say never the plan will not be totally scraped as do you believe the UN will start over after putting in so much effort and time.Yes go on. From the above points we already have the one country identity, the recognition and the stronger economy.
So tell me by how much will be the reduction of settlers?
How much property will be returned, and who will compensate those that will not?
Also tell me how your "better for everyone" solution applies when it cames to land and power sharing.
Why dont we cut to the chase your main priority is and has always been land...I have stated before that refugees should be offered the right to return where there properities are available or they shoudl be offered exchanged land in the south or compensation. Settlers should be allowed to stay if they meet the criteria set be the federal government covering both states eg minumum stay 10 years born here married to a cypriots etc.
Sometimes it is more sometimes it is less. Would you be happy to get less? You sure 'd be happy to get more, no?
Anyway personally I am not interested for partition. You have every right to get doomed with partition and be eradicated by settlers, but I have to think of my own eradication that will follow yours after they start leaking by the millions in my "partitioned" part.