This is the eminently sensible way forward. There seems to be this notion that we will revert back to the past as soon as Turkish soldiers leave.
And of course as soon as the National Guard and Eldik leave.
This is the eminently sensible way forward. There seems to be this notion that we will revert back to the past as soon as Turkish soldiers leave.
Metecyp wrote: We were supposed to be safeguarded through agreement as well in 1963. But the agreements mean nothing now after 40 years. That's why we need something stronger and I think it's very likely that TCs won't be majority in the north if there's no bizonality enforced. There're around 150.000 TCs. If all refugees return back, there will be 200.000 GC refugees. I'm sure many GCs would like to have a house in Kyrenia and other places. In any case, without bizonality, it's very likely that TCs will be minority in the north.
garbitsch wrote: And the problem can be solved when T.Cs acknowledge their guilt and abandon TRNC and go back to RoC. Is that what you are arguing?
Erol wrote: As we were in 1960? I understand and ultimately can accept safeguards by agreement but you must also realise why we remain 'skeptical' as to how far 'mere agreements' can actualy protected us, given the history, if those that make the agreements are only doing so as a 'means to an end' and without sincereity. As important as the agreements (for me at least) is my perception of the intent of those that sign them This kind of concern is only increased when poster like boulio insist that it is both right and valid for GC to ignore any agrement they have made or may make in the future if they deem it to be against their interest later - as he has done here.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests