by denizaksulu » Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:42 am
[quote="Pyrpolizer"]Hmm not exactly DA.
Taxes were mainly on what one produced.Christians were taxed much more. There was no justice, in fact in disputes between Christans and mouslims the mouslim was always supposed to be the right one without even a trial. A Christian was EXPECTED to be and look inferior to even the poorest mouslim. Even if a Chistian was rich he was not allowed to wear better clothes or even built a bigger house than a mouslim.
Coming back to taxes people were oblidged to either pay a minimum or lose their property.There were years that people were starving how could they even pay the minimum tax? So instead of losing their properties they were donating them to the church.
It is true that the Latins were oppressive, and people initially thought the Ottomans would save them, however the Ottomans proved worse and even violated their ethics by taking their wives and daughters no questions asked not protests accepted.
Their system ended up the church having huge lands, but on the other hand that was not the objective of the priests. They themselves were the first to pay with their head for everything. Suppose you lived in those times and you became a priest out of faith. Would your objective be to make the church rich on the expense of you losing your head???[/quote]
Thank you Pyro for your response. There were differences in the way different peoples dressed, even up to the present day. A black cummerband/sash over a Braga/Vraga or black head-'band' would denote a christian and a colored / white one a Turk. And that was since the British Rule. But reading between the lines I am not far off the truth. You show me any country who was happy with their goverment!
Regards
DA