Agios Amvrosios wrote:I have read a lot of spurious babble on this forum about "the right of self determination" giving rise to the right for one ethnic group to form an ethnically cleansed racially pure, self proclaimed psuedo state.
Well you may have read it but you clearly have not understood it. No where is an argument being made that the right to self determination bestows a right to create an ethnicaly cleansed raciall pure self proclaimed pusedo state. What is being argued is that in Cyprus the two communites have rights as communites that hese rights are equal between each community and that they are greater than the rights of a minority but less than the rights of a people (as laid out in human rights charters) and that this 'right of communites' is derived from the rights of peoples but applicable when you have a senario of one people two communites.
Agios Amvrosios wrote:At what stage does the purported "right to self determination" override all other legal rights and human rights?
It never does. However the denial of the rights of one community by another can (and did) lead to such illegal actions - just as the denial of (G) Cypriot demands for self determination from the British from the 1930 onwards led to illegal action by EOKA against the British.
Agios Amvrosios wrote:What percentage of population gives rise to the right of" self determination"?
There is no simple pre define magic %. Every case has to be judged on it's merits.
Agios Amvrosios wrote:Who Farted?
Why do I even bother trying to have an 'adult' conversation with you? I guess I am just a glutton for punishment?