The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Is this GC or TC propaganda

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby halil » Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:14 am

Viewpoint wrote:
Birkibrisli wrote:
zan wrote:Bir did you not say that you had not been to Cyprus since you were a kid? How come you have got papers from 1999?????


No,mate...I have not been to my village in the Republic since I was 17....But I have visited the trnc on a few ocassions,the last one being in 1999...Hope that clears things up...


You really need to visit the TRNC to refresh your views and get a feel for the current situation and lack of progress, the saying in the north is "we are better off as we are"...the undertones are very stron in this message for those that want to understand the realities of the situation.


gardaş lot's of things change since 1974.
let me tell u about my story.i was born the village called FOTA (DAĞYOLU). UP to 1974 i could travel from my village to GONYELİ, ORTAKOY, LEFKOSA. and wise versa.that's all gardaş. As u know we are living in the island. İf i tell u i can not swim ,can u belive it ? it is correct gardaş. u know why we could not travel around the island. i was in jail in my own country.in 1975 i finished my technical school .i went to study at ODTÜ in turkey.when i went to turkey KÖYDEN İNDİM ŞEHRE.... u know the film of the kemal sunal.exactly same thing happened to me.Now we are free we can go every where we want to go. no fear for me at all.
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby humanist » Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:29 am

Birkibrisli.......thank you for the coments earlier and you are right. And on that note I am not sure whether it is time to rejoice over Papadopoulos initiation of a meeting with Talat or not. Regardless I think it is an election stunt and not a step to be proud of if I were he. He could have initiated this a year ago and persisted till he got Talat to agree to a meeting. Anyway lets focus on the positives and I hope that the two leaders make some headways in solving the Cyprus Problem.

A good beginning is to invite Talat to join him in the RoC parliament/ government as per 1960 constitution and use that as the stepp to bringing the two peoples together. Perhaps based on Kikapus proposal for a UNITED States of Cyprus.
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

Postby zan » Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:33 am

halil wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
Birkibrisli wrote:
zan wrote:Bir did you not say that you had not been to Cyprus since you were a kid? How come you have got papers from 1999?????


No,mate...I have not been to my village in the Republic since I was 17....But I have visited the trnc on a few ocassions,the last one being in 1999...Hope that clears things up...


You really need to visit the TRNC to refresh your views and get a feel for the current situation and lack of progress, the saying in the north is "we are better off as we are"...the undertones are very stron in this message for those that want to understand the realities of the situation.


garda? lot's of things change since 1974.
let me tell u about my story.i was born the village called FOTA (DA?YOLU). UP to 1974 i could travel from my village to GONYEL?, ORTAKOY, LEFKOSA. and wise versa.that's all garda?. As u know we are living in the island. ?f i tell u i can not swim ,can u belive it ? it is correct garda?. u know why we could not travel around the island. i was in jail in my own country.in 1975 i finished my technical school .i went to study at ODTÜ in turkey.when i went to turkey KÖYDEN ?ND?M ?EHRE.... u know the film of the kemal sunal.exactly same thing happened to me.Now we are free we can go every where we want to go. no fear for me at all.



You know this makes me equaly angry and sad...We have living proof of what went on in many of us that are posting on this forum and scumbags like Snake and Kifeas and Sotos tell us we are lying. Read the words and try to understand our mindset. We cannot take anymore. :cry:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby bigOz » Thu Jul 12, 2007 10:32 am

When the war broke out in 1963, my family and I lived in Kyrenia. I was a little boy who just started to learn swimming (behind the castle - it was a rocky deserted location then). I loved the sea and walked there for a dip everyday during summer.

As from 1963 - 1968, we ended up driving to "Bogaz", between Nicosia, Gonyeli and Pinarbasi near the mountains, just to view some wide space and have an outing. I never saw the sea but dreamt about it for 6 years!

There is one memory I shall never forget; During 1969, my father sent us to stay with our uncles and cousins in Alektora for the duration of our summer holidays. As we were entering Limassol, all of a sudden the bus was travelling along the sea. All the young ones, including myself and two younger brothers glued their faces on to the windows staring out to the vast blue water in excitement and amazement! It must have been similar to those feelings of the astronauts who just landed on the moon! :D
User avatar
bigOz
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:19 am
Location: Girne - Cyprus

Postby humanist » Thu Jul 12, 2007 11:00 am

bigOz I had the same experience travelling to Lemesos along that same road a few years after you probably as I was born in 68. That road just somehow does bring you right up to a majestic view of the sea. However, this has changed since then and the last ime i visited Cyprus was along that trchered freeway with over turned cars all along the way.
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

Postby Eliko » Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:14 pm

Get Real! wrote:
iceman wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:I said many times the TCs have done FATAL mistakes over the years. The first fatal mistake was their Taksim dream, the second the settlers, the third the selling of GC properties to foreigners.


How about the fatal mistakes of GC's? would you like to list some of them also or shall i?
We know by now,blaming the other side got us no where till now,the fact is,WE both made fatal mistakes and unless WE both start admitting them WE will not achieve any progress..

The only thing I regret in my life is being born... :)




The problems which exist in Cyprus today, are NOT the responsibility of the people (G/C or T/C) for they are all Cypriots.

It is the politicians and their hidden agendas which have resulted in the situation we are ALL now in.

It suits them fine to see that WE are still at 'stalemate', it enables them to continue the game of deception that they practice so well.

I don't think the solution will come anytime soon, (my opinion).

:wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:
User avatar
Eliko
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3068
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 2:48 pm
Location: Cyprus

Postby Kikapu » Thu Jul 12, 2007 1:51 pm

bigOz wrote:
If you do have any other illnesses other than going mental in CF, then get the right paperwork from the medical authorities in Australia and you would not have to pay and/or do any service, but will be issued a permanent exemption certificate that you can use on all your travels. If you are not sure whether your illness is considered serious enough for an exemption, send me a PM and I can find out for you.


Bir,

Listen man, you cannot use "I'M A SEX MANIAC" defence as an illness and expect to be let out of doing your Military Service in Cyprus. :lol: :lol:

You better claim "Section 8" instead. :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Kikapu » Thu Jul 12, 2007 2:20 pm

zan wrote:


Working case:
My brother is 56 and went to Cyprus for the first time last year since 1964. He was told that he would have to come back to Cyprus within the year to do his service...without fail. Of course he had the option to pay as well. He is quite ill and was also told that if he sent in the relevant papers he would not have to serve or pay.


Zan,

Correct me if I'm wrong, but did I not use your brother as an example few months back, that he was told he would have to do his Military Service until the age of 70, in which you said, "yes but only if he stayed in the "TRNC" more than 90 days". Did he in fact stay more than 90 days on his first visit in 42 years when he was told that he needed to come back, or was he in Cyprus less than 90 days. At the time VP and you were on my case, that there were no Military Service required after the age of 49, if one stayed less than 90 days. VP even stated, that his uncle has been coming and going for years without having to do his Military Service before and over the age of 49 years. He never mentioned whether or not payment was made, but gave the impression that he did not, therefore accused me of just making an excuse for not travelling to the "TRNC" on my last visit to Cyprus.

Were you both wrong with those information, or was it deliberate. An honest answer will suffice. Thanks.

I knew the rules on the 3 months military without any payment and the 1 month military with half the payment (£1,500) and also the No military with full payment (£3,000). I did in fact post all this 6 months ago. My problem was, that the last information given to my brother in London by the "TRNC" office was that, I could be held and forced to do my military service right there and then depending who was on duty at the time, since I was over the age of 49. I suppose I could have bought myself out of it with £3,000 on the spot.

I'll bring extra cash next time. :lol:

I'll join Bir when he goes, so that we can both peel Potatoes together. :lol:
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby bigOz » Thu Jul 12, 2007 5:05 pm

Kikapu wrote:
zan wrote:


Working case:
My brother is 56 and went to Cyprus for the first time last year since 1964. He was told that he would have to come back to Cyprus within the year to do his service...without fail. Of course he had the option to pay as well. He is quite ill and was also told that if he sent in the relevant papers he would not have to serve or pay.


Zan,

Correct me if I'm wrong, but did I not use your brother as an example few months back, that he was told he would have to do his Military Service until the age of 70, in which you said, "yes but only if he stayed in the "TRNC" more than 90 days". Did he in fact stay more than 90 days on his first visit in 42 years when he was told that he needed to come back, or was he in Cyprus less than 90 days. At the time VP and you were on my case, that there were no Military Service required after the age of 49, if one stayed less than 90 days. VP even stated, that his uncle has been coming and going for years without having to do his Military Service before and over the age of 49 years. He never mentioned whether or not payment was made, but gave the impression that he did not, therefore accused me of just making an excuse for not travelling to the "TRNC" on my last visit to Cyprus.

Were you both wrong with those information, or was it deliberate. An honest answer will suffice. Thanks.

I knew the rules on the 3 months military without any payment and the 1 month military with half the payment (£1,500) and also the No military with full payment (£3,000). I did in fact post all this 6 months ago. My problem was, that the last information given to my brother in London by the "TRNC" office was that, I could be held and forced to do my military service right there and then depending who was on duty at the time, since I was over the age of 49. I suppose I could have bought myself out of it with £3,000 on the spot.

I'll bring extra cash next time. :lol:

I'll join Bir when he goes, so that we can both peel Potatoes together. :lol:


I do not believe neither VP nor Zan made any deliberate attempts to mislead you. I never knew the rule concerning the 49+ year olds until I looked well into it, after BK asked.

Since we are on the subject of misquotations, what you must understand and accept is that, besides many spiteful comments you had made in the past, the Armed forces in the North do not use the military service as an excuse to do rob people in the way you addressed the issue at the time!

£1500 pounds paid by 15-20 recruits doing a month's service from abroad adds up to nothing, especially after deducting the expense for each individual (equipment, clothing, boots, food, bullets fired in training etc). As I said before, many people abroad pay more to participate in war games using paint guns. Those who would pay the full £3000 number around 1-2 a year!

The real reason such a service is demanded is because it would not be fair on all those kids belonging to worse off families, who had no chance of educating their children abroad, or living abroad in better conditions, accumulating wealth and returning to their country. It would inevitably cause tension and friction with the locals who could then say "why did we have to do the military service and they are getting away with it?". And there is a moral point in that if you think about it. Remember most had to do it for 24 or 18 months not until so long ago. My two nephews have just finished serving 12 and 15 months (Uni graduates serve as ranking officers for 12 months)

Until a settlement is reached, every citizen living within TRNC, or visiting it is obliged to to their national service one way or another. It has nothing to do with the individuals' political beliefs, opinions about the solution to Cyprus problem, or wars. We all know there will be no more wars in Cyprus, so the last one shouldn't even come into the equation.

In other words, any money paid is only symbolic, and a form of compensation (albeit small) for not having to do the full service, while earning all the privileges of the others who had done it. Will you now agree that you were wrong in addressing the payment required as you once did and that it is far from being a "ransom"?
User avatar
bigOz
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1225
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 11:19 am
Location: Girne - Cyprus

Postby Kikapu » Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:35 pm

bigOz wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
zan wrote:


Working case:
My brother is 56 and went to Cyprus for the first time last year since 1964. He was told that he would have to come back to Cyprus within the year to do his service...without fail. Of course he had the option to pay as well. He is quite ill and was also told that if he sent in the relevant papers he would not have to serve or pay.


Zan,

Correct me if I'm wrong, but did I not use your brother as an example few months back, that he was told he would have to do his Military Service until the age of 70, in which you said, "yes but only if he stayed in the "TRNC" more than 90 days". Did he in fact stay more than 90 days on his first visit in 42 years when he was told that he needed to come back, or was he in Cyprus less than 90 days. At the time VP and you were on my case, that there were no Military Service required after the age of 49, if one stayed less than 90 days. VP even stated, that his uncle has been coming and going for years without having to do his Military Service before and over the age of 49 years. He never mentioned whether or not payment was made, but gave the impression that he did not, therefore accused me of just making an excuse for not travelling to the "TRNC" on my last visit to Cyprus.

Were you both wrong with those information, or was it deliberate. An honest answer will suffice. Thanks.

I knew the rules on the 3 months military without any payment and the 1 month military with half the payment (£1,500) and also the No military with full payment (£3,000). I did in fact post all this 6 months ago. My problem was, that the last information given to my brother in London by the "TRNC" office was that, I could be held and forced to do my military service right there and then depending who was on duty at the time, since I was over the age of 49. I suppose I could have bought myself out of it with £3,000 on the spot.

I'll bring extra cash next time. :lol:

I'll join Bir when he goes, so that we can both peel Potatoes together. :lol:


I do not believe neither VP nor Zan made any deliberate attempts to mislead you. I never knew the rule concerning the 49+ year olds until I looked well into it, after BK asked.

Since we are on the subject of misquotations, what you must understand and accept is that, besides many spiteful comments you had made in the past, the Armed forces in the North do not use the military service as an excuse to do rob people in the way you addressed the issue at the time!

£1500 pounds paid by 15-20 recruits doing a month's service from abroad adds up to nothing, especially after deducting the expense for each individual (equipment, clothing, boots, food, bullets fired in training etc). As I said before, many people abroad pay more to participate in war games using paint guns. Those who would pay the full £3000 number around 1-2 a year!

The real reason such a service is demanded is because it would not be fair on all those kids belonging to worse off families, who had no chance of educating their children abroad, or living abroad in better conditions, accumulating wealth and returning to their country. It would inevitably cause tension and friction with the locals who could then say "why did we have to do the military service and they are getting away with it?". And there is a moral point in that if you think about it. Remember most had to do it for 24 or 18 months not until so long ago. My two nephews have just finished serving 12 and 15 months (Uni graduates serve as ranking officers for 12 months)

Until a settlement is reached, every citizen living within TRNC, or visiting it is obliged to to their national service one way or another. It has nothing to do with the individuals' political beliefs, opinions about the solution to Cyprus problem, or wars. We all know there will be no more wars in Cyprus, so the last one shouldn't even come into the equation.

In other words, any money paid is only symbolic, and a form of compensation (albeit small) for not having to do the full service, while earning all the privileges of the others who had done it. Will you now agree that you were wrong in addressing the payment required as you once did and that it is far from being a "ransom"?


BigOz,

In the context that you have presented, and if I indeed used the word "ransom" in that context, then I can say I was wrong. However, if I used the word "ransom" in a context that the £3,000 would have been needed to pay the "TRNC" on the spot in order to gain an exit visa, or else had to remain behind to do Military Service on the spot, then the word "ransom" was used correctly. I believe my use of the word "ransom" was used for the latter purpose. Most of my conversation with VP and Zan after I came back from Cyprus relating to the Military issue was around why did I not come over to the North, and the main reason was, what was relayed to me from the London "TRNC" office to my brother few weeks before I left to come to Cyprus.

Way before you joined the Forum, we had good laugh on the forum between myself, Birkibrisli and even Miltiades about paying One months payment and doing our service all together just for the fun of it. I had already accepted that, so I had no fears as far as that went. I also knew, that this being my first time, I did not need to pay anything up front but to agree on a date to come back in the near future on what ever length of military service agreed on. So that was clear to me, because I have been chasing this issue for the last one year, even with a politician in the "TRNC".

As far as VP and Zan not knowing the 49+ rules, I have a hard time accepting that, given Zan's brothers situation, if he did in fact stay less than 90 days in the "TRNC" and also VP claiming to have gone to the ASAL SUBE in person to ask, and was told that I did not need to do military service or pay. Someone is not being totally up front here. Perhaps you can ask them as to what had really happened.

I had also several times copy pasted them this site
http://www.mucahit.net/asal/askeralma_ENG.htm
and particularly this point:

QUESTION 3. WHEN CAN THE SPECIAL STATUS MILITARY SERVICE PERSONS FULFILL THEIR MILITARY SERVICE OBLIGATIONS?

ANSWER 3.
A. WHENEVER THEY WISH, THEY WILL BE ENROLLED WITH THE FIRST RECRATS.
B. IF THEY STAY MORE THEN 90 DAYS IN ONE CALENDER YEAR IN THE T.R.N.C.
C. THEY CAN DELAY THEIR MILITARY SERVICE THE LATEST TILL THE AGE OF 49.

Of course, it was totally ignored each time. So I knew from last year regarding the age factor and I had accepted it, and we even made two more calls to the ASAL SUBE early this year just to make sure nothing had changed in the rules, and was told, that there was no escaping either half or the full amount of the money, or no money and doing some Military service. The "curve ball" that threw me off, was what was said by the London "TRNC" office.

I know the military is not getting "rich" on what they charge due to expenses for each individual. My gripe if any is, I did not leave Cyprus to try and avoid to do Military Service but rather it was the circumstances and to be asked to do the service or pay up to the age of 70 years old, to me, is asking way too much. When I corresponded with this particular politician, I had asked him to do away with the whole military service altogether for those living abroad to encourage more to return back to Cyprus and bring their Tourist Dollars with them, to help the TC economy, and I believe it was suggested and was up for some legislative ruling on it, but I guess not much has come out of it.

So, there you go.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests