Halil and denizaksulu I didn't see you complaining about this: http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.php?t=11892
SN apparently wanted to test my Greek, so I couldn't deny this to our intellectual guest from the motherland.
Simon wrote:SN, I am very disappointed in your posts I have to say. Let me state why. You seem to continuously point out Greece's past policies (i.e. 1913) etc, and consider these in isolation, without considering what is occuring in the rest of the region, and without considering why Greece's attitudes are as they are today; instead, merely putting them down to "colonialism" and "Nazism". Allow me to enlighten you; what was the purpose of Bulgaria during the Balkan Wars? What was the purpose of the Ottoman Empire? What is the purpose of FYROM when they spread propaganda incessantly and name their Airport after Alexander the Great? What is the purpose of the modern day Turkish state, when they expand their territorial waters to the limit allowed under International law, but threaten Greece with War if they do the same in the Aegean? What is there purpose when they constantly violate Greek airspace, hence CAUSING dog-fights? What is the purpose of Turkey when it suddenly decides to claim Imia and several other islets in the Aegean? What is the purpose of Turkey when, allowed to intervene in Cyprus to preserve the constitution, instead, creates a new Turkish state, colonizes the area with over 100,000 settlers and keeps 40,000 Turkish troops in the area for 33 years and counting?
You must consider the reasons for Greece behaving in the way it does, i.e. not calling the VARIOUS minorities in Thrace, Turkish. When doing this, you must also consider the way in which Greek minorities in the region have been treated. Yet you seem to care very little about this. How have Greeks been treated in Turkey? Far worse than the Turks in Greece. Heard of the Istanbul Pogrom? Greece did not retaliate to this, hence the Turkish minority has exapnded. Perhaps you should mention this, or does that not suite your biased defamation of your country? Greeks have also in the past had a bad time in Albania, have they not?
I do not actually believe it matters too much whether we call them Turkish or Muslim in any event. What matters is, are they treated as equal Greek citizens in everyday life; and I believe the answer to that is Yes. In the past (Balkan Wars), all the nations had populations in various areas, and ALL of them tried to expand their borders, not just Greece. Look at the ethnic cleansing Turkey carried out in Smyrna, ending thousands of years of Greeks living in Anatolia. The minorities of Greece are treated well in comparison to the region and when considering its history; they have flourished and expanded in number. Can Turkey say this? I am not saying that improvements cannot be made, but the way you are criticising Greece is ludicrous and exaggerated to say the very least (i.e. Nazi state) Sorry, I can't help but laugh at that one.
So stop blindly maligning Greece, and consider the whole region, and why Greece behaves like it does. Greece is still a new nation, and it feels threatened by Turkey (a much larger nation on its border, that is extremely nationalistic) and FYROM, which repeatedly has displayed expansionist attitudes towards Greece. It seems to me that the only thing that would make you happy is for Greece to allow itself to be broken-up by its neighbors, and your completely naive, short-sighted and vendetta-like attitude towards Greece, compels me to believe you have an agenda and therefore lose all credit.
P.S. Before you start pleading for multi-culturalism in Greece, perhaps you may want to just think about it a little longer. It is not all it is made out to be: ask the UK.
Simon wrote:SN, I am very disappointed in your posts I have to say. Let me state why. You seem to continuously point out Greece's past policies (i.e. 1913) etc, and consider these in isolation, without considering what is occuring in the rest of the region, and without considering why Greece's attitudes are as they are today; instead, merely putting them down to "colonialism" and "Nazism". Allow me to enlighten you; what was the purpose of Bulgaria during the Balkan Wars? What was the purpose of the Ottoman Empire? What is the purpose of FYROM when they spread propaganda incessantly and name their Airport after Alexander the Great? What is the purpose of the modern day Turkish state, when they expand their territorial waters to the limit allowed under International law, but threaten Greece with War if they do the same in the Aegean? What is there purpose when they constantly violate Greek airspace, hence CAUSING dog-fights? What is the purpose of Turkey when it suddenly decides to claim Imia and several other islets in the Aegean? What is the purpose of Turkey when, allowed to intervene in Cyprus to preserve the constitution, instead, creates a new Turkish state, colonizes the area with over 100,000 settlers and keeps 40,000 Turkish troops in the area for 33 years and counting?
You must consider the reasons for Greece behaving in the way it does, i.e. not calling the VARIOUS minorities in Thrace, Turkish. When doing this, you must also consider the way in which Greek minorities in the region have been treated. Yet you seem to care very little about this. How have Greeks been treated in Turkey? Far worse than the Turks in Greece. Heard of the Istanbul Pogrom? Greece did not retaliate to this, hence the Turkish minority has exapnded. Perhaps you should mention this, or does that not suite your biased defamation of your country? Greeks have also in the past had a bad time in Albania, have they not?
I do not actually believe it matters too much whether we call them Turkish or Muslim in any event. What matters is, are they treated as equal Greek citizens in everyday life; and I believe the answer to that is Yes. In the past (Balkan Wars), all the nations had populations in various areas, and ALL of them tried to expand their borders, not just Greece. Look at the ethnic cleansing Turkey carried out in Smyrna, ending thousands of years of Greeks living in Anatolia. The minorities of Greece are treated well in comparison to the region and when considering its history; they have flourished and expanded in number. Can Turkey say this? I am not saying that improvements cannot be made, but the way you are criticising Greece is ludicrous and exaggerated to say the very least (i.e. Nazi state) Sorry, I can't help but laugh at that one.
So stop blindly maligning Greece, and consider the whole region, and why Greece behaves like it does. Greece is still a new nation, and it feels threatened by Turkey (a much larger nation on its border, that is extremely nationalistic) and FYROM, which repeatedly has displayed expansionist attitudes towards Greece. It seems to me that the only thing that would make you happy is for Greece to allow itself to be broken-up by its neighbors, and your completely naive, short-sighted and vendetta-like attitude towards Greece, compels me to believe you have an agenda and therefore lose all credit.
P.S. Before you start pleading for multi-culturalism in Greece, perhaps you may want to just think about it a little longer. It is not all it is made out to be: ask the UK.
alexISS wrote:Simon wrote:SN, I am very disappointed in your posts I have to say. Let me state why. You seem to continuously point out Greece's past policies (i.e. 1913) etc, and consider these in isolation, without considering what is occuring in the rest of the region, and without considering why Greece's attitudes are as they are today; instead, merely putting them down to "colonialism" and "Nazism". Allow me to enlighten you; what was the purpose of Bulgaria during the Balkan Wars? What was the purpose of the Ottoman Empire? What is the purpose of FYROM when they spread propaganda incessantly and name their Airport after Alexander the Great? What is the purpose of the modern day Turkish state, when they expand their territorial waters to the limit allowed under International law, but threaten Greece with War if they do the same in the Aegean? What is there purpose when they constantly violate Greek airspace, hence CAUSING dog-fights? What is the purpose of Turkey when it suddenly decides to claim Imia and several other islets in the Aegean? What is the purpose of Turkey when, allowed to intervene in Cyprus to preserve the constitution, instead, creates a new Turkish state, colonizes the area with over 100,000 settlers and keeps 40,000 Turkish troops in the area for 33 years and counting?
You must consider the reasons for Greece behaving in the way it does, i.e. not calling the VARIOUS minorities in Thrace, Turkish. When doing this, you must also consider the way in which Greek minorities in the region have been treated. Yet you seem to care very little about this. How have Greeks been treated in Turkey? Far worse than the Turks in Greece. Heard of the Istanbul Pogrom? Greece did not retaliate to this, hence the Turkish minority has exapnded. Perhaps you should mention this, or does that not suite your biased defamation of your country? Greeks have also in the past had a bad time in Albania, have they not?
I do not actually believe it matters too much whether we call them Turkish or Muslim in any event. What matters is, are they treated as equal Greek citizens in everyday life; and I believe the answer to that is Yes. In the past (Balkan Wars), all the nations had populations in various areas, and ALL of them tried to expand their borders, not just Greece. Look at the ethnic cleansing Turkey carried out in Smyrna, ending thousands of years of Greeks living in Anatolia. The minorities of Greece are treated well in comparison to the region and when considering its history; they have flourished and expanded in number. Can Turkey say this? I am not saying that improvements cannot be made, but the way you are criticising Greece is ludicrous and exaggerated to say the very least (i.e. Nazi state) Sorry, I can't help but laugh at that one.
So stop blindly maligning Greece, and consider the whole region, and why Greece behaves like it does. Greece is still a new nation, and it feels threatened by Turkey (a much larger nation on its border, that is extremely nationalistic) and FYROM, which repeatedly has displayed expansionist attitudes towards Greece. It seems to me that the only thing that would make you happy is for Greece to allow itself to be broken-up by its neighbors, and your completely naive, short-sighted and vendetta-like attitude towards Greece, compels me to believe you have an agenda and therefore lose all credit.
P.S. Before you start pleading for multi-culturalism in Greece, perhaps you may want to just think about it a little longer. It is not all it is made out to be: ask the UK.
Hi Simon.
Just one comment on your well written post. Greece infact recognises that there is a Turkish minority in Thrace, as well as a Pomak and a Roma one. All three combined are referred to as the muslim minority of Thrace, since they not only live together in the region, they also share the same religion. What Turkey promotes and demands is the WHOLE muslim minority to be recognised as Turkish, which is obviously unacceptable not only by Greece, but also by every human rights organisation and, of course, the EU, which perfectly understands this and has raised no issues regarding the characterisation of the minority as "muslim"
SN wrote: Greece recognizes shit Alexis.Shut up with your propaganda.
Greece will never recognize an ethic minority.The name of the minority is MUSLIM not Turskish or Pomak or whatever bullshit your dad says.
I have bashed you repeatdly over the issue.
FIND ME WHERE IT SAYS OFFICIALLY THE MINORITY IS TURKISH.THEN WE CAN TALK.
alexISS wrote:SN wrote: Greece recognizes shit Alexis.Shut up with your propaganda.
Greece will never recognize an ethic minority.The name of the minority is MUSLIM not Turskish or Pomak or whatever bullshit your dad says.
I have bashed you repeatdly over the issue.
FIND ME WHERE IT SAYS OFFICIALLY THE MINORITY IS TURKISH.THEN WE CAN TALK.
Greece is the only country in the region where minorities are respected you poor bastard, if you had ever met a single muslim Greek in your life you'd know that. Quit stuffing your messed up brain with junk from FYROMian and Turkish propaganda sites and go meet the minority members and SEE what's the real deal. Greece is doing just fine, succesfully defending itself against the Turkish militaristic regime that daily sends its fighters for "training" over Samos or Chios. The Turkish generals that run that land can huff and puff and curse all they want, they'll never have it their way and neither will you. As for FYROM, they most certainly are no threat to Greece, but that doesn't mean Greece is going to allow those lost Bulgarians to claim Greek history and land as their own. Didn't you know that in the first draft of this country's constitution it was mentioned that there are "occupied macedonian lands" in Greece that needed to be freed? What about the withdrawn bank note with an image of the white tower in Thessaloniki? Would you say Thessaloniki is a "FYROMian" city? Maybe the epistles of Paul to the Thessaloniceans were originally written in Slavic and were translated by the Greek propagandists later...
It's hard for a developed, modern country like Greece to have such backward neighbours you know, yet we manage to maintain a good quality of life. Yes, a country in the same region with Albania, FYROM and Turkey is capable of hosting Olympic Games, joining the EuroZone and excelling in Science, Arts and Sports (by the way, how pissed were you when Greece won the Euro cup? ).
Who knows, maybe those third world countries will eventually wake up, like Bulgaria did, and join the rest of the world in the 21st century. Then maybe their citizens won't have to live with $200 per month.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests