zan wrote:By the way....Were Halil and Iceman the only ones that made an effort to turn up looking clean shaved and well dressed
AWWW! Come on guys..I was only joking.
Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:Piratis you are tainting a happy thread. Give it a rest.
And you are tainting many happy threads with your sign.
Get Real! wrote:Niki wrote:The thing about discussions face to face is that facial expressions and mannerisms add hugely to someones point of view when they're explaining how they feel. This is why smileys are useful but of course can't compare with the real thing.
Much better to get together to talk about things (hey maybe QAMERSLAND was right! )
Facial expressions and mannerisms are great when dealing with a personal problem between two people or a small group at work etc but the Cyprus problem is different as it's a string of many technical problems where facial expressions don't really help.
iceman wrote:DT. wrote:Piratis wrote:DT, I joined this forum long time ago. When I did I was with the (apparently wrong) impression TCs didn't really want the occupation and they were oppressed by the Turkish army. I was very disappointed when I realized that in fact the majority of TCs support the actions of the Turkish army in Cyprus. Soon I realized that people will put their interests above everything else. And lets face it, if the 18% keeps 36% of land and they are promised that will be able to keep that just for themselves, then of course they will believe partition is in their interests.
This is not just about TCs. This is about human nature. Take those that profited from the stock market scandal and they got rich on the expense of others. Do you see those people voluntarily giving back the richness they gained? They can have friends and aquitances among those that were cheated, but still that would not change a thing.
I see myself as a realist (but not as a defeatist). I know we are the weak side, but at the same time I know what are the only ways we can have a possibility to gain our land back. Unfortunately making friendships is not one of them. It can be great from every other respect, and it can not harm, but it will not give us our land back. I believe Get Real was already aware of this fact even before he proposed the meeting.
And about the "hard line" part I will agree with you. It is not as if we decided on something that suits us and only us and we keep a hard line about it. What we want is universally accepted principles like those of human rights and democracy, like they exist in all other modern democracies in the world. Keeping a "hard line" on such principles is not wrong. What is wrong is the contrary: making compromises and discounts on things such as human rights and democracy.
never said this was about solving the bloody thing either...The cyprus issue however is not just land, refugees and safeguards. Its also about knowing yourself, and in country that we want to unite, to know yourself is also to know your compatriots. In all your posts you alsways talk of re-unification...if this re-unification happened tomorrow as you want it we might as well have re-unified with Martians.
Very sensible post DT...How can one talk about reunification when one refuses to even talk to the people this reunification will be with..
We have more in common that we think we do and the only way to proper reunification will be through learning/understanding each others position & needs...This can only be achieved through contact.
Get Real! wrote:zan wrote:Piratis you are tainting a happy thread. Give it a rest.
And you are tainting many happy threads with your sign.
Piratis wrote:iceman wrote:DT. wrote:Piratis wrote:DT, I joined this forum long time ago. When I did I was with the (apparently wrong) impression TCs didn't really want the occupation and they were oppressed by the Turkish army. I was very disappointed when I realized that in fact the majority of TCs support the actions of the Turkish army in Cyprus. Soon I realized that people will put their interests above everything else. And lets face it, if the 18% keeps 36% of land and they are promised that will be able to keep that just for themselves, then of course they will believe partition is in their interests.
This is not just about TCs. This is about human nature. Take those that profited from the stock market scandal and they got rich on the expense of others. Do you see those people voluntarily giving back the richness they gained? They can have friends and aquitances among those that were cheated, but still that would not change a thing.
I see myself as a realist (but not as a defeatist). I know we are the weak side, but at the same time I know what are the only ways we can have a possibility to gain our land back. Unfortunately making friendships is not one of them. It can be great from every other respect, and it can not harm, but it will not give us our land back. I believe Get Real was already aware of this fact even before he proposed the meeting.
And about the "hard line" part I will agree with you. It is not as if we decided on something that suits us and only us and we keep a hard line about it. What we want is universally accepted principles like those of human rights and democracy, like they exist in all other modern democracies in the world. Keeping a "hard line" on such principles is not wrong. What is wrong is the contrary: making compromises and discounts on things such as human rights and democracy.
never said this was about solving the bloody thing either...The cyprus issue however is not just land, refugees and safeguards. Its also about knowing yourself, and in country that we want to unite, to know yourself is also to know your compatriots. In all your posts you alsways talk of re-unification...if this re-unification happened tomorrow as you want it we might as well have re-unified with Martians.
Very sensible post DT...How can one talk about reunification when one refuses to even talk to the people this reunification will be with..
We have more in common that we think we do and the only way to proper reunification will be through learning/understanding each others position & needs...This can only be achieved through contact.
First of all the only kind of people I don't like to meet are those that show disrespect towards me.
Secondly I don't even know the people that live in the next apartment block, yet we can all live together peacefully in the same country simply because we respect the laws and each other. Thats all that is needed.
Anyways, if you want to prove me wrong, then have several meetings and then come and tell us what changed. Then we will see what the changes have been and if you were right. If after the meetings you withdraw your support for the "trnc" and demands for TCs keeping disproportionately large parts of lands and power, then I will publicly apologize and admit that I was wrong about this issue, and I would be extremely glad about it.
Niki wrote:Get Real! wrote:Niki wrote:The thing about discussions face to face is that facial expressions and mannerisms add hugely to someones point of view when they're explaining how they feel. This is why smileys are useful but of course can't compare with the real thing.
Much better to get together to talk about things (hey maybe QAMERSLAND was right! )
Facial expressions and mannerisms are great when dealing with a personal problem between two people or a small group at work etc but the Cyprus problem is different as it's a string of many technical problems where facial expressions don't really help.
Of course I can't begin to offer opinions about the 'Cyprus Problem' but I still don't agree! Person to person meeting gives a respect that cannot be gained out of words alone no matter what the subject. Why do Country leaders meet to discuss world issues if it could all be done through a forum?
I was pointing out the fact that the people who have met today will give each other's opinions more respect to as you can now picture each other.
Piratis wrote:iceman wrote:DT. wrote:Piratis wrote:DT, I joined this forum long time ago. When I did I was with the (apparently wrong) impression TCs didn't really want the occupation and they were oppressed by the Turkish army. I was very disappointed when I realized that in fact the majority of TCs support the actions of the Turkish army in Cyprus. Soon I realized that people will put their interests above everything else. And lets face it, if the 18% keeps 36% of land and they are promised that will be able to keep that just for themselves, then of course they will believe partition is in their interests.
This is not just about TCs. This is about human nature. Take those that profited from the stock market scandal and they got rich on the expense of others. Do you see those people voluntarily giving back the richness they gained? They can have friends and aquitances among those that were cheated, but still that would not change a thing.
I see myself as a realist (but not as a defeatist). I know we are the weak side, but at the same time I know what are the only ways we can have a possibility to gain our land back. Unfortunately making friendships is not one of them. It can be great from every other respect, and it can not harm, but it will not give us our land back. I believe Get Real was already aware of this fact even before he proposed the meeting.
And about the "hard line" part I will agree with you. It is not as if we decided on something that suits us and only us and we keep a hard line about it. What we want is universally accepted principles like those of human rights and democracy, like they exist in all other modern democracies in the world. Keeping a "hard line" on such principles is not wrong. What is wrong is the contrary: making compromises and discounts on things such as human rights and democracy.
never said this was about solving the bloody thing either...The cyprus issue however is not just land, refugees and safeguards. Its also about knowing yourself, and in country that we want to unite, to know yourself is also to know your compatriots. In all your posts you alsways talk of re-unification...if this re-unification happened tomorrow as you want it we might as well have re-unified with Martians.
Very sensible post DT...How can one talk about reunification when one refuses to even talk to the people this reunification will be with..
We have more in common that we think we do and the only way to proper reunification will be through learning/understanding each others position & needs...This can only be achieved through contact.
First of all the only kind of people I don't like to meet are those that show disrespect towards me.
Secondly I don't even know the people that live in the next apartment block, yet we can all live together peacefully in the same country simply because we respect the laws and each other. Thats all that is needed.
Anyways, if you want to prove me wrong, then have several meetings and then come and tell us what changed. Then we will see what the changes have been and if you were right. If after the meetings you withdraw your support for the "trnc" and demands for TCs keeping disproportionately large parts of lands and power, then I will publicly apologize and admit that I was wrong about this issue, and I would be extremely glad about it.
i'll ask again then Piratis. Whats the point of being on this forum and posting on a folder called cyprus problem?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests