Turkcyp, Insan and others:
The Annan plan or any new form of a solution plan, are all meaningless unless both communities accept one of them.
What is the definition of an "acceptable solution plan"?
We all know that no plan can satisfy all the people of all sides. Let's assume that we are "democratic" within our communities and that there is more respect among the people of each community than what we think exists between the people of each community.
The votes were GCs 74% NO and TCs 64% YES, right?
If we assume that the winning plan should be more compromising to the side with the most objectors, without being undemocratic to the side with the most supporters, then we are looking for a plan that would satisfy at least 50+% of the people from each community.
Would you be willing to accept and respect the opinion of both democratic majorities, even if your opinion falls with the 50-% NO voters?
Would a solution of this nature satisfy your definitions of "equality" between the two communities?
Don't you think such a plan may have more chances to succeed, than any other plan, that some third party may concoct and force on the one or the other majority? Could such a plan come to fruition? Who or what group of people could work together, from each community, to negotiate and formulate such a plan?
“YES PLAN" Solution Formula: 50+% GCs (yes) + 50+% TCs (yes) =majority of Cypriots said "YES"
First step:
Do you agree with the formula, or not?
Second step:
(To be developed after the first step is taken.)