Piratis wrote:No it is not.
If the world did not accept that the TC exist as a people seperate to the GC people then in 1960 you would simply have got indpendance of the single unitary Cypriot people and gone and joined Greece. If the world today did not accpet the rights of TC as a people seperate from the GC people there would be no talk of 'bi communal' solutions.
Piratis wrote:The reason we have negotiations is that we want to find a solution soon.
The reason we have negotiations is because your refusal to accept and grant the TC people their rights (from 63 onwards and before) led to you loosing property and land. You want the land back. You do not have the means to take it back by force so you 'agree' to negotiating for it back - whilst all the while continuing to insist the TC people have no rights as people - which is what caused you to losse your properties in the first place.
Piratis wrote:Otherwise we could simply demand for legality to return and for Turkey to obey the UN resolutions.
Well you tried that ever since you lost your properties. The demand however fell on deaf ears around the world - exactly because such a demand without also a recognition of the TC peoples rights as well was not acceptable to the world.
Piratis wrote:If China had invaded us, we would be having the exact same negotiations.
What absolute tosh! You really think that if china had invaded Cyprus the negotiations (and that's assuming that force was not used to remove them) would be based on a bi communal solution based on a GC and Chinese commuity in Cyprus. What absolute tosh.
Piratis wrote:The occupation by Turkey is not any more legal than it would be the occupation by any other country.
The occupation (your word) by Turkey of part of Cyprus is no more legal than the terrorist actions of EOKA were legal.
In any case the actions of Turkey - leagl or otherwise have NOTHING to do with if we are a people or not. There is almost no suprious argument you will not use to deny us our human rights. According to you we are not a people because you say we are not, because we did not live in one area pre 1960, because Turkey has acted illegaly and any other number of excuses besides. None of that changes the fact that we are a people. We share a common language - destinct from GC (and you and your family do not), we share a common religion - destinct from GC (and you and your family do not), we share a common culture destinct from GC (and you and your family do not) , we are of suffient number to adminsiter 'self rule' (total or in a limited compromised way) (and you and your family are not).
Piratis wrote:You decided this by yourselves in order to find an excuse to take our human rights away and gain more on our loss.
We did not decide we are a people. We are a people. I can no more decide the TC are a people than I can decide if I am human or not. Either I am human or I am not. You telling me that my declaring I am human does not make me human is irrelevant.
We did not insist on our rights as a people in 1960 onwards as a means of depriving you of your rights and stealing your land - quite the reverse. We insited on our rights (though accepting limits on them at the same time) to stop you taking our rights away and gaingin on our loss.
Piratis wrote:You believe that you are something special, that deserves super rights.
No I refuse to accept that the TC people are something inferior (to the GC people). I ask for no more (and no less) rights than the GC people have. I accept to limit my rights as people to achieve peace in a shared Island as I expect the GC people to do the same.
Piratis wrote:this belief of yours doesn't make your actions any more legal though, and you should be prepared to pay the penalty of your illegal actions when the time will come.
Just as you should be prepared to accpet the penalty of GC actions to deny TC people their rights that occured in 74?