DT. wrote:"THAT A CYPRUS SETTLEMENT MUST BE BASED ON
please read carefully. I will look for a Turkish translator if you like cause your English might not be up to scratch.
this resoultion says what the cyprus settlement must be based on. Until then the internationally recognised government and sole sovereign over the entire land of this island will be the only govt allowed to act, sign, agree on behalf of Cyprus.
I am reading it carefully, but it seems that you are reading it partially:
that a Cyprus settlement must be based on a State of Cyprus
thus defining the State of Cyprus subsequently and simultaneously reaffirming that the current recognized state is not what it is supposed to be according to the U.N.
As far as the rest of it concerned, I suggest you read the following again:
If what you have is recognized, legitimate, legal and acceptable by the whole world, than why point to what it should be thus simultaneously declaring incompatible with the principles of the U.N. Furthermore, why allow one of the two communities to solely represent and negotiate on its behalf against the other community on what a bi-communal state it is supposed to become? There is no logic to this and it is hypocrisy of the worst kind. It is international political interests overriding the principles of law, legitimacy and logic, and we as TCs have to cope with it.