The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


They ‘protect’ Turkish properties even from their owners!

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

They ‘protect’ Turkish properties even from their owners!

Postby paaul12 » Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:21 am

Let me get this correct, TC's can't have THEIR property back, why?


___________________________________________________________

They ‘protect’ Turkish properties even from their owners!

Greek Cypriots want their properties back but deny the same right to Turkish Cypriots

The Greek Cypriot High Court concluded that Turkish Cypriots ‘do not have the right’ to use their properties left in Southern Cyprus. The Court approved the decision made by the Greek Cypriot Ministry of Internal Affairs that denied the request that property in Bahcalar village in the Larnaca District be returned to 2 Turkish Cypriots, Zehra Kemal Ahmet and Nuray Kemal Ahmet, who now live in Kyrenia. The appeal by the sisters against the Greek Cypriot government was concluded on June 8 when Minos Kronidis, the court judge, advanced this claim while announcing the verdict: “The Ministry of Internal Affairs is regarded as being the authority in managing Turkish Cypriot properties as it is the curator, as long as this abnormal situation in the island resulting from the Turkish invasion continues. Consequently Turkish Cypriot owners of these properties, which are under Greek Cypriot control, do not have the right to use these properties; since they are interdicted to use their right of possession until the facts created in 1974 cease.”

According to Greek Cypriot media, the Greek Cypriot High Court had, on legal grounds, denied the application made by the Turkish Cypriots because ‘they ran away from the Greek Cypriot side due to ‘their fear’ and claimed that they would not have lost their properties if the 1974 Turkish Military Expedition, which it defined as the ‘invasion’, had not happened. The Greek Cypriot High Court claimed that the “Turkish Cypriot applicants abdicated their properties due to the Turkish ‘invasion’”.

Also in the verdict concerning complaints by the Turkish Cypriots in their applications that their constitutional rights had been invaded, it was claimed: “Since they have moved collectively and abandoned their properties, it was a necessity to protect the Turkish Cypriot properties for their own benefit. It was completely justifiable to make the law known as ‘Turkish Cypriot Properties Curatorship’. On the basis of this law, Turkish Cypriots are not devoid of their properties, yet the management of these properties are left to the curators during the abnormal circumstances.”

Source: http://www.observercyprus.com/observer/ ... px?id=1791
User avatar
paaul12
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 6:57 pm

Postby humanist » Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:27 am

It appears that all Turkish Cypriots want to do is take take take.... its about time Turkish Cypriots need to make a decison ........This guy wants his cake and eat it too. Well too bad. If he wants his property that much he can sureneder the refugee houe in the north and move to the south where he wil undoubtedly be getting his house back.

Incidently this article came out at the same time when a group of Turkish Cypriots marched through the streets of Morphou under the banner of Grey Wolves ex-claiming that Cyprus is Turkish, We are Turkish and Greek are not getiing it back from us. After these exclamations why should the RoC give him back his land or is it a case we'll take the north without their willingness then cry poor and take what belongs to us rightfully in the south also. Lets fuck the fuckers over again. When you start behaving like Cypriots you will get your land back.
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

Postby zan » Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:33 am

I think it is time to change the inscription at the bottom of your posts Humanist. :roll:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby paaul12 » Sat Jun 23, 2007 7:33 pm

I think it is time to change the inscription at the bottom of your posts Humanist.



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
paaul12
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 6:57 pm

Postby humanist » Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:37 pm

take that shmuck off your face Paul. Love and respect does not ean allowing someone to take advantage of you continously. I would love my Turkish speaking neighbour as I would anyone else. I respect TC's as co-owners of Cyprus all of it not just a picece of it. I support them in their struggle for equality and I support that they take up their positions within the legitimate world wide recognised government of Cyprus. I DO NOT condone or support the so called trnc. I do not support (whilst I can understand and support TC's living in refugee property for now) the fact that TC's have chosen to hold hostage half my country, I do not support the illegalities in realtion to the sale of refugee land which I believe is sale of your own country) I do not support the racism toward other Cypriots. I would upport that guy to have his property back if he were living in the south or wanting to move in the south. I would come to Cyrus and petition and stand with signs protesting that he get his property if that were the case. But I refuse to support someone who is illegally living in grandmothers home and her sisters home and wanting their land in the south. Perhaps TC and GC's have different ways of viewing ethics but I don't believe that is ethical and if this is the case I might as well stop talking with TC's now as they are definetely a different species to me.
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

Postby zan » Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:44 pm

humanist wrote:take that shmuck off your face Paul. Love and respect does not ean allowing someone to take advantage of you continously. I would love my Turkish speaking neighbour as I would anyone else. I respect TC's as co-owners of Cyprus all of it not just a picece of it. I support them in their struggle for equality and I support that they take up their positions within the legitimate world wide recognised government of Cyprus. I DO NOT condone or support the so called trnc. I do not support (whilst I can understand and support TC's living in refugee property for now) the fact that TC's have chosen to hold hostage half my country, I do not support the illegalities in realtion to the sale of refugee land which I believe is sale of your own country) I do not support the racism toward other Cypriots. I would upport that guy to have his property back if he were living in the south or wanting to move in the south. I would come to Cyrus and petition and stand with signs protesting that he get his property if that were the case. But I refuse to support someone who is illegally living in grandmothers home and her sisters home and wanting their land in the south. Perhaps TC and GC's have different ways of viewing ethics but I don't believe that is ethical and if this is the case I might as well stop talking with TC's now as they are definetely a different species to me.



They certainly are. The GCs forget there agression against others but keep on about the ones that came their way afterwards.
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm


Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest