The Mail has an article mourning the drop in exports.
This article is totally off the mark. The problem is not just price, but quality is more important. Of course, no one will buy a Cyprus wine of plonkish quality at €3/bottle when they can get an equally plonkish French wine at €1.50/bottle (£3 in Cyprus) or a really good Spanish wine at €3/bottle (£5 in Cyprus).
If Cyprus wants to export wine, they have to produce quality wines that sell on their merits, rather than price, while nevertheless remaining competitive. They cannot compete in the plonk market and Cyprus wine has a bad image amongst wine experts (there are a few exceptions) and are often justly relegated to plonk.
Let me cite the Neuchâtel wines from Switzerland. They produce some good pinot noir reds and an excellent rosé (Oeil de Perdrix). 30 years ago, their main production was an extremely mediocre white from the Chasselas grape. It was said that it was just about good enough to fill car batteries. The vignerons got together and said that they have to do something to improve their image. The first thing was they started to tend their vines better and, by selective culling, reducing the output to 1-2 kg of grapes per vine (instead of 10 kg). This produced better and sweeter grapes. Instead of flooding the market with hectolitres of undrinkable stuff, they selectively classified the better wines from this new type of viticulture and started publicising it. Their chasselas wine today is every bit as good as the Vaudois and Valaisan and the vignerons are making more money per hectare producing less wine, but of much better quality. This is what should happen here.