miltiades wrote:alexISS wrote:miltiades wrote:ALEX , I wonder what your views were on a part of the AP , which you have no doubt studied in order to consider it acceptable for the Cypriots ,
that part that dealt with police stations split 50 -50 and each allowed in the Plan to fly the Greek and Turkish flag respectively. How about the division of our roads with either side owning a specific road but with the other side having the right to construct a by- pass in order to get to a G/C or T/C destination. This from a Plan that was promoted as a unifying plan when it was nothing of the sort. Turkish troops , that are now considered Internationally to be occupying forces , were given a concrete legal status and the ultimate right to take it upon themselves without UN , EU or other directives , to interfere in any part of Cyprus that they saw fit. Thanks but no thanks. The plan was a Turkish designed and bore the hallmarks of a legal recognition of the de facto situation.
With hindsight we knew that we could not rely on any one to oppose Turkey should Turkey not willing to honour its part of the agreement.
I opposed the AP because it fell way way short of the ultimate dream that Cypriots have of a united Independent Cyprus, member of the EU .
You do not have to point the plan's shortcomings, I know there are many. I also know it was not a unification plan, but it was close. You cannot force true unification to people that do not want it and you cannot force people that want to unify to be separated. The Annan plan was the only one that had some chance for success and, if the people would feel comfortable enough after some time, its shortcomings could be amended. The Turkish troops would be gradually withdrawn and Turkey would have no say in the future of an EU country, no matter what.
I would like to ask this: Do you feel that, after the rejection of the plan, the future looks brighter for Cyprus? Because what I feel is that NOW Turkey has more chances for a de facto recognition of the "TRNC" than ever, the world does not see the Greek Cypriots as victims of an invasion anymore, but as spoilt rich people who do not want to share their wealth with their "isolated" Turkish countrymen
Let me vehemently disagree with your assertion that the "TRNC" is close now than ever before , in obtaining recognition . The International community will abide by the rule of law , the RoC is the only recognised government of Cyprus and sooner rather than later new efforts to unite our island will be actioned upon. The recognition that our T/Cs are isolated and not involved in the general prosperity of Cyprus is entirely acceptable by all . Cyprus is not just for today but it is for the future also and that is the reason why our prime considerations must be to remove any possibility of future conflict that would have been inevitable had the AP plan succeeded. For any solution to be successful and long lasting the majorities on both sides must feel comfortable with the contents.
The prime negatives in the Cyprob are the perceived "motherlands" without whom all Cypriots would soon begin the process of reconciliation. I have not met or even spoken on the phone to Bitkibrisly , have only spoken to Kikapu once on the phone , have met and spoken to mrfromng many times , all these three are T/Cs , but all three consider me one of them , a Cypriot , a G/C .
miltiades you all live abroad and are dilluted Cypriots who have no idea of living here day in day out..yet you know whats best for us better than the people that live here. You try to push us into a situation where you are comfortable with your 80% advantage. Are you willing to live in a TC state as you suggest we do in a GC state? Would you be OK with being the minority in a TC state? there are many Gcs who are vehemently against this a few of them on this forum. A level playing field is vital for the process to move forward, you will see this unfold in the coming years.