devil wrote:Firstly, it is clear you know absolutely nothing about a) fire propagation b) metallurgy c) structural ironwork.
Secondly, it is clear that you base your judgement uniquely on a film made by fruitcakes.
The inviduals that are critical of the NIST and FEMA reports far from being fruitcases, are in fact quite respectable professors in engineering and physics. Among them are Profs. A. K. Dewdney, David L. Griscom, Hugo Bachmann, Jörg Schneider, Jack Keller, Robert Bowman, Steven Jones, Robert S. Boyer, Joanna Rankin, and many many more. Among the so-calle fruitcases are more than a 100 senior millitary, intelligence service, law enforcement, and government officials, above 140 engineers and architects, more than a hundred 9-11 survivors and family members, as well as around 70 prominent entertainment and media professionals among them Charlie Sheen, Michael Moore, Aaron Russo, etc...
Thirdly, it is clear you have not read the scientific reports based on the computer modelling of what really happened (maybe you prefer to watch the visual media as reading such reports is totally beyond the understanding of a deranged mind)
Have you? The final NIST report was titled "Report of the National Construction Safety Team on the Collapses of the World Trade Center Towers" and it explains only the "sequence of events leading to the collapse" and not the collapse itself, which displays many of the features of controlled demolition. Subsequent to the publication NIST has altered its site, and the report is not readily accessible.
The report on the collapse of WTC7 (a 47 storey which NIST found too insignificant to even mention in its report) was studied by FEMA. In its latest report FEMA notes :
Loss of structural integrity was likely a result of weakening caused by fires on the 5th to 7th floors. The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue.
The research, investigation and analysis, 6 years after the events, has not been forthcoming.
Finally, just consider that you are insulting the memory of the ~3,000 persons who died in this tragedy. You are SICK!
You are pathetic. The 9-11 truth movement was initially fueled by the very people who lost relatives on that tragic day, and whom according to you it was supposed to insult.