The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Birk please read

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby iceman » Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:35 pm

Kifeas wrote:
Bananiot wrote:
I repeat once again that in my view my side did not reject the Annan Plan because of its complexity but mainly because powerful and influential people in my community consider sharing power with Turkish Cypriots (as two politically equal communities) an anathema and a stain on our hellenism.


This is an insult to the thousands of refugees -in fact the majority of them including those whose immediate return was guaranteed, who have rejected the Annan plan simply because they felt it did not do any sense and /or justice, and it had very little to do with what they have been expecting all these years and what their consciousness would allow them to tolerate as compromised solution! Yes, there are those you described above, however, what did Kofi Annan do in order to expose them? Nothing! Instead, he presented a plan that besides been on the basis of (a twisted) power sharing, it also was against human rights, it satisfied all the demands of Turkey and the British to have Cyprus under their domination, and finally, it granted complete ethnic ownership of 30% of Cyprus to the 18% TC community and to Turkey via its settlers here! This was the Annan plan that you so much cherish!


Like it or not,the future UN plans will not be much different to Annan's version...Get used to the idea :wink:
iceman
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2015
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Originally from Limassol now living in Kyrenia

Postby denizaksulu » Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:39 pm

Kikapu; A nation is not a state, and is traditionally monocultural. The term is often used as a synonym for ethnic group (sometimes "ethnos"). On this forum we had better be careful how we use words as generalising often leads to a failure in putting our ideas correctly to others.

Kifeas; You have answered your own question. Read what you wrote! Thats why I dont think you can use the word "NATION" for the RoC. Best to find another word which will encompass the peoples of Cyprus. I am sure you can mange that, The Greek language is so rich with words find an alternative to "Nation".
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby Kikapu » Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:39 pm

Bananiot wrote:Kikapu my friend, do you really think that the two communities can come together and draw up an agreement by themselves without outside brokering? Is this really feasible? I appreciate you are frustrated by the impasse (aren't we all) but any help that we can still offer our country can only be a product of realistic and rational approaches that take into consideration the situation on the ground. If not, we will be left with the sour taste of wishful thinking that has done nobody any good. On top, the longer we take to appreciate this the nearesr we draw to final partition. I repeat once again that in my view my side did not reject the Annan Plan because of its complexity but mainly because powerful and influential people in my community consider sharing power with Turkish Cypriots (as two politically equal communities) an anathema and a stain on our hellenism.


Hello Bananiot,

I'm not against outside help at all, if we can close the gap and find a solution between us. Just as you say that your side does not want to share power with the TC's which they consider it to be a "taboo" of some sort, based on your belief, and you know your people better than me. At the same time, what makes you think, that many on the TC side would come to the table, even if there were proportional power given to the TC's. At this point in time, what good is the power to the TC's, when they feel that they have 37% of Cyprus in their pockets, and if they just hold on to it long enough, to get recognition, which then they can have 100% Power and 37% of Cyprus. So needless to say, both sides are playing for time, at the expense of the whole island.

The AP was the product of the outside world, but what good did it do to solve the Cyprus Problem, when the main "actors" were not the principle creators to bring peace about, because each side has what the other side wants, but are not willing to compromise.

So lets take a look at the interest of the parties involved.

Turkey is only going to be a willing helper, if she is allowed into the EU, so we are already 15 years to never, for Turkey helping the situation in Cyprus in a positive way.

Greece I believe is no longer the major obstacle, in Cyprus's future negotiations, with the TC's, since Cyprus's entry into the EU.

Britain does not seem to care, one way or the other, as long as they get to keep their bases in Cyprus.

EU and UN has too much on their plates, to worry about Cyprus problems, unless there's fighting, which we don't have one at the moment. It took them close to 30 years for the last Plan. Had they made the plan more workable, I do not believe that the GC would have said NO, then again, Cyprus having entered into the EU did not help the matters either, because there was always going to be the thinking in the minds of the GC's, that now that they were in the EU, they will be in a better position to get a better deal than what AP offered. Was that just GREED or was it BUSINESS like, which only time will tell, depending which way the wind blows for Turkey down the road, regarding entering the EU.

The TC's said YES to AP, but I will have to quote my cousins husband, who has bought a lot of GC's land, as far as 8-9 years ago and is a staunch Partitionist, who said to me when I met them in Cyprus last month, that the TC's voted for the Annan Plan and not for peace. If the TC's were getting most things they wanted and saw the AP as a means to basically declare the Northern Cyprus as a Turkish owned Land, except for giving some parts for the GC's and the return of parts of Famagusta. This would have been a disaster from the beginning. People would have waited for 40+ years for a solution, but only small percentage of the GC's would have been satisfied, versus large majority of the TC's satisfied, at the expense of the majority of the GC's.

Yes it was a Plan, but if we were going to have problems down the road, just like the 1960 Constitution, then it was not going to work. So now we are down to the two main players which are the TC's and the GC's. It should be us to try and have a solution. We should be the ones who should demand from our governments and the leaders from both sides to talk to each other. Have regular street marches to get the attention of the International Community. Let's show some initiative. Well, I do not see it happening, because Turkey still had 15 years or longer waiting period, regarding the EU, so what is the point us doing anything, if Turkey is the "deal breaker".

So, by all means lets get everyone involved in helping us, but if Turkey, GC's and TC's do not show interest, why should the International Community, in solving our problems, or recognising the "TRNC". This is why I let off steam now and again with the Partitionist, who can blame others for not bringing peace about, when at the same time, they are making the matters worse by selling off GC land to others. I suppose the TC's will want a "True Peace" when they no longer have anything to sell. In the meantime, the RoC prospers, and the large majority of the TC's find themselves falling behind the GC economically, with no help in sight for them.

It truly is a catch-22 situation, or a "Revolving Doors", that never seems to go anywhere.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Kifeas » Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:57 pm

iceman wrote:
Kifeas wrote:
Bananiot wrote:
I repeat once again that in my view my side did not reject the Annan Plan because of its complexity but mainly because powerful and influential people in my community consider sharing power with Turkish Cypriots (as two politically equal communities) an anathema and a stain on our hellenism.


This is an insult to the thousands of refugees -in fact the majority of them including those whose immediate return was guaranteed, who have rejected the Annan plan simply because they felt it did not do any sense and /or justice, and it had very little to do with what they have been expecting all these years and what their consciousness would allow them to tolerate as compromised solution! Yes, there are those you described above, however, what did Kofi Annan do in order to expose them? Nothing! Instead, he presented a plan that besides been on the basis of (a twisted) power sharing, it also was against human rights, it satisfied all the demands of Turkey and the British to have Cyprus under their domination, and finally, it granted complete ethnic ownership of 30% of Cyprus to the 18% TC community and to Turkey via its settlers here! This was the Annan plan that you so much cherish!


Like it or not,the future UN plans will not be much different to Annan's version...Get used to the idea :wink:


Like it or not, there won't be any future UN plans! It is either your side abandons its intransigent and opportunistic stance and seats down with us to agree a solution on the parameters I have indicated above, or you will continue to remain isolated (and Turkey outside the EU) until the hell freezes! :wink:
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby denizaksulu » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:05 pm

Kifeas, you realise that you are condemning the refugees and the hopefuls till hell freezes!!! We are the patient side. We can wait. "You'd burn the blanket fotr the sake of one flea?" What a mentality.
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby Kifeas » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:06 pm

denizaksulu wrote:Kikapu; A nation is not a state, and is traditionally monocultural. The term is often used as a synonym for ethnic group (sometimes "ethnos"). On this forum we had better be careful how we use words as generalising often leads to a failure in putting our ideas correctly to others.

Kifeas; You have answered your own question. Read what you wrote! Thats why I dont think you can use the word "NATION" for the RoC. Best to find another word which will encompass the peoples of Cyprus. I am sure you can mange that, The Greek language is so rich with words find an alternative to "Nation".


Therefore the term "Organisation of the United Nations" (UN) is wrong, and it should be replaced with the term "Organisation of the United States!" Interesting! Therefore, from now on we all will be saying that Cyprus, Turkey, Greece, Italy, Britain, US, Russia, etc, are not members of the UN but instead they are members of the US! Interesting!


This is only to help you:
http://www.answers.com/nation

PS: Therefore, neither Turkey is a Nation!
Last edited by Kifeas on Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby iceman » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:07 pm

Kifeas wrote:
iceman wrote:
Kifeas wrote:
Bananiot wrote:
I repeat once again that in my view my side did not reject the Annan Plan because of its complexity but mainly because powerful and influential people in my community consider sharing power with Turkish Cypriots (as two politically equal communities) an anathema and a stain on our hellenism.


This is an insult to the thousands of refugees -in fact the majority of them including those whose immediate return was guaranteed, who have rejected the Annan plan simply because they felt it did not do any sense and /or justice, and it had very little to do with what they have been expecting all these years and what their consciousness would allow them to tolerate as compromised solution! Yes, there are those you described above, however, what did Kofi Annan do in order to expose them? Nothing! Instead, he presented a plan that besides been on the basis of (a twisted) power sharing, it also was against human rights, it satisfied all the demands of Turkey and the British to have Cyprus under their domination, and finally, it granted complete ethnic ownership of 30% of Cyprus to the 18% TC community and to Turkey via its settlers here! This was the Annan plan that you so much cherish!


Like it or not,the future UN plans will not be much different to Annan's version...Get used to the idea :wink:


Like it or not, there won't be any future UN plans! It is either your side abandons its intransigent and opportunistic stance and seats down with us to agree a solution on the parameters I have indicated above, or you will continue to remain isolated (and Turkey outside the EU) until the hell freezes! :wink:


Ha ha ha....you will be waiting a long time for that my friend...we have managed to survive through isolation so far,what makes you think we will give up? :wink:
iceman
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2015
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Originally from Limassol now living in Kyrenia

Postby Kifeas » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:12 pm

iceman wrote:
Kifeas wrote:
iceman wrote:
Kifeas wrote:
Bananiot wrote:
I repeat once again that in my view my side did not reject the Annan Plan because of its complexity but mainly because powerful and influential people in my community consider sharing power with Turkish Cypriots (as two politically equal communities) an anathema and a stain on our hellenism.


This is an insult to the thousands of refugees -in fact the majority of them including those whose immediate return was guaranteed, who have rejected the Annan plan simply because they felt it did not do any sense and /or justice, and it had very little to do with what they have been expecting all these years and what their consciousness would allow them to tolerate as compromised solution! Yes, there are those you described above, however, what did Kofi Annan do in order to expose them? Nothing! Instead, he presented a plan that besides been on the basis of (a twisted) power sharing, it also was against human rights, it satisfied all the demands of Turkey and the British to have Cyprus under their domination, and finally, it granted complete ethnic ownership of 30% of Cyprus to the 18% TC community and to Turkey via its settlers here! This was the Annan plan that you so much cherish!


Like it or not,the future UN plans will not be much different to Annan's version...Get used to the idea :wink:


Like it or not, there won't be any future UN plans! It is either your side abandons its intransigent and opportunistic stance and seats down with us to agree a solution on the parameters I have indicated above, or you will continue to remain isolated (and Turkey outside the EU) until the hell freezes! :wink:


Ha ha ha....you will be waiting a long time for that my friend...we have managed to survive through isolation so far,what makes you think we will give up? :wink:


How long my friend? 30, 40, 50 years! Too little! We have survived 306 years under the ottomans, 100 years under the Venetians, 400 years under the Romans, 200 years under the Arabs, 200 years under the Franks, 100 years under the Assyrians, 300 years under the Persians, etc, etc! What makes you think that we will ever give up? :wink:
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby denizaksulu » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:15 pm

Yes, Kifeas; Turks are a Nation, Greeks are a Nation in the meaning I use it.
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby Kifeas » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:17 pm

denizaksulu wrote:Yes, Kifeas; Turks are a Nation, Greeks are a Nation in the meaning I use it.


Yeah? Then, in the meaning you use it, Turks are a nation but Turkey isn't one! Oh ...I forgot, the kurds are not kurds but ...mountain Turks!
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest