Because the above conversation...belong to children around the age of kindergarten...and the thread is about the views of the Greek Cypriots towards the Turkish Cypriot...I would like to quote something that I came across in an article...I hate copy paste but at least this is quite interesting and doesnt repeat the same things
This is an article about the images of ‘the Other’ ‘the Turk’ in Greek Cypriot children’s imaginations...and children can not separate the Turks for TC so easy...
There was a Turk, a Greek and an American and they went up a very tall mountain. The American took his shirt off and threw it down. The Turk asked him, ‘Why did you throw your shirt down?’ And the American told him, ‘We have a lot in America’. Then the Turk was jealous and took his
watch off and threw it down. The Cypriot [she means the ‘Greek’] says
to the Turk, ‘Why did you throw your watch down? It’s so nice!’ They
were all friends. And the Turk said, ‘Ouh, we have a lot in Turkey’. Then
the Cypriot takes the Turk and throws him down from the cliff and the
American says, ‘Why did you throw the Turk down the cliff?’ And the
Cypriot said, ‘We have a lot of them in Cyprus’.
When Elena, a sixth grader, told me this joke she laughed with her heart. It was meant to be a joke, to entertain. But the matter to which it referred was a serious one, for Elena and all the other children I worked with and who at times would tell me jokes like this. The choice of Turks in the punchline is not accidental, of course. It is precisely the reason for it being
a joke. The Turks are a well-understood problem for Greek Cypriot children. They are the invaders, the occupiers, the enemy. Therefore, as
a group they have a unique position in their imaginations.
[...]
Identity construction is a situated process. It takes place in specific social, cultural, and political contexts at a specific point in history. Today the primary ‘other’ against whom Greek Cypriot children construct their identities are the Turks. ‘Others’ change through time, enemies come and go, even if nationalist historiography likes to construct them as eternal adversaries of the nation. The inter-ethnic problems of the Greek and Turkish Cypriot communities during the 1960s, the coup and the
Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974, and the stalemate in all political attempts to solve the Cyprus problem have helped create and sustain the image of ‘the Turk’ as the principal enemy of Greek Cypriots and the Greek nation at large. The Greek Cypriot children I worked with had well-constructed images of the Turks in their minds. Their understandings were greatly informed by the larger cultural discourses to which they were exposed. In the process of growing up in a society where they are constantly made aware of the ‘abnormality’ resulting from the
Turkish occupation in Cyprus, they learn that Turks stand as the major obstacle to the reinstatement of peace and tranquillity in their country. They come to see the division of Cyprus as an unjust state of affairs, one for which Turkey, above all, is responsible. During this process of growing up and learning who they themselves are, they also learn who the enemies are. Enemies are indeed important in identity construction; they help to concretise the sense of ‘self’. This dialectic between ‘self’ and ‘other’–the very process of identity construction–is what I am concerned with here.
The article is quite big to post it here but is really interesting...and i can send it to those who are interested...the words "barbaric Turks" as the general idea that children get from school is also mention there etc.