The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Kikapodopulous!

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby BirKibrisli » Sat May 26, 2007 4:54 pm

iceman wrote:
karma wrote:
LENA wrote:
zan wrote:For those of you that are being pedantic about the words mrfomng used, "gavur" does not mean Greek but is used for people that have no faith to speak of.


Zan, "gavur" I have been told that is the Greek, the Christians. But if you want to say Greek is "Yamanli" and Cypriot "Kibrisli". If a TC want to say GC say "Rum" and if a Turk want to say GC say "Yuman"And "Kafir" is someone who is not Muslim. Now can anybody tell me what Gavur really means?


Gavur is me =no religion...no nation...no taboos...no pressure :)
Love & red wine :wink:


Gavur = infidel
(in Muslim use) a person who does not accept the Islamic faith; kaffir.


Let us not beat around the bush,people...In Cypriot Turkish when you talk about "gavurlar" (and it is the plural version most of the time) you mean only one thing ---------->rumlar (Greek Cypriots)...Lets have the decency to admit that at least...
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby BirKibrisli » Sat May 26, 2007 5:31 pm

Viewpoint wrote:Bir although I understand where you are coming from I cannot but try and explain our side of the coin. Your surrender mentality is not acceptable to TCs who reside in the TRNC. You are what I was 15 years ago a dilluted TCs living with the love of his country wanting to return to an island where the political problems were solved and everyone lived in harmony. When I took the decision to move to the TRNC I started to wake up to the reality of the situation and how my people the Turkish Cypriots were having to find a balance between Turkey who is their only real ally and their desire for a solution.You must understand a very basic issue, that if asked, a very high percentage of TCs here on the island would rather be assimilated into Turks than GCs this is a fact of life and you and I cannot change this. The 63-74 period has left great scars on the TC people and the GC OXI was a heavy slap in the face of TCs and served as a reminder of the GC negativity towards TCs which people in the north can still remember and recall. For example my father in law still tells the story that two best friends a TC and GC ate and drunk together lived in the same village and their families were really close but the GC would always walk a few steps behind the TC, one day the TC said why do you do this walk next to me not behind me the GC turned around red faced and said you are such a good friend that the only way I can get back at you for being a TC is to step on your shadow. Im sure you can work out the moral of this story and why TCs always question anything GCs say or do.
Lets just go with your theory about the resounding GC OXI that it was not because GCs did not want to share anything with us but that it was a rejection of that particular plan. Isnt it down to the rejecting side to take positive measures to propel the process along explaining their concerns not only to us (before you say but Talat rejected this) but the world? What have they done over the past 3 years to to amend those areas in the plan which concern them? All we have seen is a policy of demonizing the AP to a point of next to no return. I am very interested to see in my life time what they will do if talks ever resume whether the UN will start from stratch. After so much effort I doubt they will and the GCs will have to lick up from the floor what they have spat out (A Turkish-Cypriot saying).

Living with the daily reality of the Cyprus problem here on the island has changed my view totally I have become a believer of partition and I do not hide this fact as I truly believe it is the best way forward for both sides. The GCs will get their TC free state and more land, the TCs will live without fear of being dominated or discriminated against by GCs and being reduced to a minority in their own country without any say in their own future. These are genuine fears and if nothing is done by those that just dismiss them they will continue to be obstacles towards creating a more flexible and accepting TC community.

The only way forward if you accept the principle that both communities are equals is to create a level playing field of 2 states where what you see fit for your own community/state you have to accept as a norm for the other state, with freedom of movement where TCs and GCs can decide for themselves where they wish to reside accepting the adminstration of that state. You may say once TCs have obtained their own state they will not unite but I say TCs are not stupid if they see and experience that living with GCs does not create them problems and that their fears and concerns have dissapeared due to a build up of trust and co-operation they will not oppose unification under a federal structure. I would be interested to hear from GCs and their aligned TCs compatriots what type of security they would need to accept such a move for creating a level playing field?


Thank you for you very measured response,VP...

I have no doubt that the TC fear of GC domination is very real.And I accept without reservation that the GC OXI was a big psychological slap in the face for TCs...My biff with you guys is that you are stuck in the 60s and refuse to move on...Times have changed...Cyprus is in the EU now...Enosis is dead and buried...Eoka is in the past...The security we need is right there in the international law of the EU...And of course we are only 5 minutes away by fighter jet from Turkey if need be...But we still insist that GC people should accept the de facto partition,forced upon them by 40,000 foreign soldiers...That they should give up all hope of ever returning to their homes...Of accepting that 20% of the population should not only have equal political power in international law,but also guarantees written in concrete and safeguarded by Turkish troops...
If you were a GC what would you do to a politician who told you that is what he/she is going to accept on your behalf...???The level playing field you are talking about will never happen...Because that field will not be level...it will be tilted in the TC favour so much that most GCs will fall off it into the sea...Like the 200,000 (or whatever refugees from the North)...
What for you is a level playing field is total capitulation for the GCs,their acceptance of the rule of the jungle,"what is won by bloodshedding etc..."type fascist logic...It will never happen...You accuse me of being a capitulatist yet you expect the 80% majority of Cypriots to do just that...
All of you are ignoring my often stated formula of returning in an orderly fashion to the 1960 constitution,keeping the guarantee agreements and all...and making a fresh start...Sometime down the line when we are well and truly trusting each other we can agree on measures to make the whole thing more and more democratic...We might have to agree on a timetable before we begin the whole new republic but that can be arranged if goodwill exist...By insisting on recognition and lifting of the sanctions etc you are essentially sticking out your middle finger to our compatriots on the other side and laughing in their face...It makes you look very shifty and insincere indeed... :(
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby zan » Sat May 26, 2007 5:36 pm

Birkibrisli wrote:
iceman wrote:
karma wrote:
LENA wrote:
zan wrote:For those of you that are being pedantic about the words mrfomng used, "gavur" does not mean Greek but is used for people that have no faith to speak of.


Zan, "gavur" I have been told that is the Greek, the Christians. But if you want to say Greek is "Yamanli" and Cypriot "Kibrisli". If a TC want to say GC say "Rum" and if a Turk want to say GC say "Yuman"And "Kafir" is someone who is not Muslim. Now can anybody tell me what Gavur really means?


Gavur is me =no religion...no nation...no taboos...no pressure :)
Love & red wine :wink:


Gavur = infidel
(in Muslim use) a person who does not accept the Islamic faith; kaffir.


Let us not beat around the bush,people...In Cypriot Turkish when you talk about "gavurlar" (and it is the plural version most of the time) you mean only one thing ---------->rumlar (Greek Cypriots)...Lets have the decency to admit that at least...


Never implied anything else. If you notice I said that my explanation was for the pedantics trying to explain the real meaning of the word. It is actually one of my least favourite words used to describe the Greeks. I tell my dad off every time he uses it when he forgets.


Shame you are not so quick in defending the Turks when we get attacked or abused in this manner though. Your use of the word "barbarian" has a similar effect.
:roll:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby BirKibrisli » Sat May 26, 2007 5:58 pm

zan wrote:
Birkibrisli wrote:
iceman wrote:
karma wrote:
LENA wrote:
zan wrote:For those of you that are being pedantic about the words mrfomng used, "gavur" does not mean Greek but is used for people that have no faith to speak of.


Zan, "gavur" I have been told that is the Greek, the Christians. But if you want to say Greek is "Yamanli" and Cypriot "Kibrisli". If a TC want to say GC say "Rum" and if a Turk want to say GC say "Yuman"And "Kafir" is someone who is not Muslim. Now can anybody tell me what Gavur really means?


Gavur is me =no religion...no nation...no taboos...no pressure :)
Love & red wine :wink:


Gavur = infidel
(in Muslim use) a person who does not accept the Islamic faith; kaffir.


Let us not beat around the bush,people...In Cypriot Turkish when you talk about "gavurlar" (and it is the plural version most of the time) you mean only one thing ---------->rumlar (Greek Cypriots)...Lets have the decency to admit that at least...


Never implied anything else. If you notice I said that my explanation was for the pedantics trying to explain the real meaning of the word. It is actually one of my least favourite words used to describe the Greeks. I tell my dad off every time he uses it when he forgets.


Shame you are not so quick in defending the Turks when we get attacked or abused in this manner though. Your use of the word "barbarian" has a similar effect.
:roll:


I too never use that ugly word,Zan,or let it be used around me...
It is alright for me to call the Turks 'barbarians" (though I can't recall ever using that word,have I???) but let anybody else try and see what I do to them... :wink:
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Viewpoint » Sat May 26, 2007 7:16 pm

Birkibrisli wrote:
zan wrote:
Birkibrisli wrote:
iceman wrote:
karma wrote:
LENA wrote:
zan wrote:For those of you that are being pedantic about the words mrfomng used, "gavur" does not mean Greek but is used for people that have no faith to speak of.


Zan, "gavur" I have been told that is the Greek, the Christians. But if you want to say Greek is "Yamanli" and Cypriot "Kibrisli". If a TC want to say GC say "Rum" and if a Turk want to say GC say "Yuman"And "Kafir" is someone who is not Muslim. Now can anybody tell me what Gavur really means?


Gavur is me =no religion...no nation...no taboos...no pressure :)
Love & red wine :wink:


Gavur = infidel
(in Muslim use) a person who does not accept the Islamic faith; kaffir.


Let us not beat around the bush,people...In Cypriot Turkish when you talk about "gavurlar" (and it is the plural version most of the time) you mean only one thing ---------->rumlar (Greek Cypriots)...Lets have the decency to admit that at least...


Never implied anything else. If you notice I said that my explanation was for the pedantics trying to explain the real meaning of the word. It is actually one of my least favourite words used to describe the Greeks. I tell my dad off every time he uses it when he forgets.


Shame you are not so quick in defending the Turks when we get attacked or abused in this manner though. Your use of the word "barbarian" has a similar effect.
:roll:


I too never use that ugly word,Zan,or let it be used around me...
It is alright for me to call the Turks 'barbarians" (though I can't recall ever using that word,have I???) but let anybody else try and see what I do to them... :wink:


This statement is so unconvincing, sorry but your past posts and viewpoint do not support your claim, no disrespect meant.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby zan » Sat May 26, 2007 7:29 pm

Did not even bother to reply to that one VP. The man has a lapse in memory when it suits him, even when it comes to giving himself the excuse as to why he is allowed to use the word "Barbarian". One minute he is not a Turk but a Cypriot and the next he is a Turk and therefore allowed to use the word. I still can't make up my mind whether it his age or he is just playing games.
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby karma » Sat May 26, 2007 7:32 pm

zan wrote:Did not even bother to reply to that one VP. The man has a lapse in memory when it suits him, even when it comes to giving himself the excuse as to why he is allowed to use the word "Barbarian". One minute he is not a Turk but a Cypriot and the next he is a Turk and therefore allowed to use the word. I still can't make up my mind whether it his age or he is just playing games.


it is bcoz the Turks are not barbarians but berberians u know why??
coz
'' bir berber bir berbere gel beraber Berberistan'da bit berber dukkani acalim demis'' thts why.. :roll:
User avatar
karma
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3096
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:31 pm

Postby zan » Sat May 26, 2007 7:40 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby T_C » Sat May 26, 2007 7:51 pm

karma wrote:
zan wrote:Did not even bother to reply to that one VP. The man has a lapse in memory when it suits him, even when it comes to giving himself the excuse as to why he is allowed to use the word "Barbarian". One minute he is not a Turk but a Cypriot and the next he is a Turk and therefore allowed to use the word. I still can't make up my mind whether it his age or he is just playing games.


it is bcoz the Turks are not barbarians but berberians u know why??
coz
'' bir berber bir berbere gel beraber Berberistan'da bit berber dukkani acalim demis'' thts why.. :roll:


LMAO LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLLOLOOOOOLOLOLLOOLOLOOLOOLOLLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOL :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
T_C
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3513
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:16 am
Location: London

Postby Viewpoint » Sat May 26, 2007 10:07 pm

Birkibrisli
Thank you for you very measured response,VP..


Without provocation or verbal abuse this is what you get, thank you for noticing.

I have no doubt that the TC fear of GC domination is very real.And I accept without reservation that the GC OXI was a big psychological slap in the face for TCs...


Unless these and other concerns are addressed psychological barriers will remain firmly in place and no progress will be made just labelling them excuses will not make them go away.

My biff with you guys is that you are stuck in the 60s and refuse to move on...


We to have moved we had to fight for our survival and now the TRNC is our safe haven, hich totally changed the ball game. As my signature says we should learn our lessons from the past to ensure we do not repeat the same mistakes in the future. Thats why we TCs always ask for safe guards to ensure that past events are not allowed to ever happen again.

Times have changed...Cyprus is in the EU now...Enosis is dead and buried...Eoka is in the past...The security we need is right there in the international law of the EU...And of course we are only 5 minutes away by fighter jet from Turkey if need be...But we still insist that GC people should accept the de facto partition,forced upon them by 40,000 foreign soldiers...That they should give up all hope of ever returning to their homes...Of accepting that 20% of the population should not only have equal political power in international law,but also guarantees written in concrete and safeguarded by Turkish troops...


Have they really? TCs are still isolated and we have the GCs controlling and benefiting from the "RoC" just as they wish. Cyprus in the EU, so what? what has really changed? imo nothing with regards to solving the Cyprus issue. Enosis/Eoka was born out of the need to change things, it only takes a small spark of nationalism and a few idiots to create mayhem and death, look at our neighbours Isreal/Palenstine, bombs go off all the time is that what ou want for Cyprus? how will you tell the parents of dead school children when a bomb is planted by extremists unhappy with the structure of the united Cyprus that unification was a good idea, when we have had no inter communal fighting for 33 years. What has the internatıonal law done for the GCs? have they gotten back 37% of the island they lost in 1974? If Turkey was to leave she could never return in a time of crisis, and you know this, we would be in the EU and she would be outside and therefore unable to run to our rescue yet again. Unless the EU and GCs accept that her Guarantor status continues and she may intervene until a time when she enters the EU then this may be acceptable to TCs but seeing GCs have a big problem with this they would reject it. The EU for security now you are joking, need I remind you of Bosnia while thousands or innocent people were being kiled the EU was a spctator, they have 323 meeting to decide what colour toilet rolls to buy I hate to even imagine the number of deaths that would occur while they were having meeting upon meeting with no results, these would be our lives.

The support for partition should be just as acceptable as yours is for unificaiton as it is in reality an alternative...support will increase as people realize that agreeing solution is a very unlikely event in the light of the past 44 years.

But that to one side you to have to get your misconceptions out of your head I and many TCs do not feel that GC refugees should not return to the north and receive their property rights because this is not the case. As for political imbalance we TCs only want to have the power to stop any decisions that will effect our community negatively and we would be very foolish to block any decision that would be in everyones favor dont you think? Give us a little creidt for gods sake we are not stupid. Kifeas put forward a structure which on the face of it appeared acceptable.

If you were a GC what would you do to a politician who told you that is what he/she is going to accept on your behalf...???The level playing field you are talking about will never happen...Because that field will not be level...it will be tilted in the TC favour so much that most GCs will fall off it into the sea...Like the 200,000 (or whatever refugees from the North)...
What for you is a level playing field is total capitulation for the GCs,their acceptance of the rule of the jungle,"what is won by bloodshedding etc..."type fascist logic...It will never happen...You accuse me of being a capitulatist yet you expect the 80% majority of Cypriots to do just that...


Without a level playing field we will not progress, why do you think the EU are trying to ease our isolation. With regards to the GC politican who had the vision to see that these steps would also benefit their community and in time bring about trust and co-operation unfortunately he/she doesnt exsist but understanding that economical progress would aid the financial burden GC fear and help push the process along whereby eg Maras is returned, troops are reduced, GC refugees go home, settlers are returned etc.

You have surrendered to the GC viewpoint if you have not could you please put forward arguements in favor of the TCs of what we should do to ensure to are not pushed to one side by the numerical majority?

All of you are ignoring my often stated formula of returning in an orderly fashion to the 1960 constitution,keeping the guarantee agreements and all...and making a fresh start...Sometime down the line when we are well and truly trusting each other we can agree on measures to make the whole thing more and more democratic...We might have to agree on a timetable before we begin the whole new republic but that can be arranged if goodwill exist...By insisting on recognition and lifting of the sanctions etc you are essentially sticking out your middle finger to our compatriots on the other side and laughing in their face...It makes you look very shifty and insincere indeed...


How long do you think before the GCs via the EU would produce Akritas 2? Piratis always confirms they were forced into signing the 1960 agreements and clearly they had no intention of sticking to it. They only cling on dearly to this constitiution becuase the TC factor was eradicated go back to it and they will do everything possible to change it. Plus for Tcs to go back to an agreement which caused themm so much tragedy would psychological very difficult as the " RoC" is viewed as a GC state which we have never felt a part of.

Recognition could be the last lap so to speak by which time we would know if we can indeed trust each other and unite. Pushing us into a GC dominated state is asking us to make a great leap of faith and will put our community into danger of becoming a minority in our own country.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests