by askimwos » Tue May 22, 2007 8:28 am
The fact that the article states that the content is simply the opinion of the author and not even the Bow group says enough about whether is biased or unbiased.
I do not dispute a number of dates that are included in the article. However, the article is so much one sided that it automaticly loses its credibility. I will not speak about half truths and lies in the article, hoewever I will point just some things that the article on purpose ommit and extract their own conclusions:
a. the actions of TMT
b. the killings of GCs by TC extremists during the period 1963-67
c. the real reasons why Junta executed the 15 July coup
d. The attrocities of the Turkish army during the invation
e. the human rights of the GC refugees
f. Denktash policies during the negotiations
g. the dismissal of the fact that TCs being 18% and controling 36% of the territory
h. the selective use of UN resolutions. Not a single of the numerous ones calling the occupation illegal and calling for the removal of Turkish troops from the island is quoted.
i. and finally the fact that even level headed TCs would observe that the article is pure propaganda.
I am a GC and if I saw an article that purely dismissed any wrongdoings from the GC side, I wouldn't bother reading the whole thing, let alone post it here and label it an independent source.