Cyprus-Forum.com

[zan]

Some of you have agreed that the Turkish intervention was legal but the continued "occupation" is not. Can we have a date on when Turkey should have given the island back to the legal government of Cyprus?

[humanist]

Zan I do not think its a question on whether Turkey should have given the Island back to the legal government of Cyprus but ....... When should have Turkey terminated its illegal occupation of Cyprus and allowed all its citizens regardless of their linguistis background to live on their Island, freely and justly and justly.

[cypezokyli]

Some of you have agreed that the Turkish intervention was legal but the continued "occupation" is not.

nobody that i know (referring to gcs always) agreed with the term intervention.

Can we have a date on when Turkey should have given the island back to the legal government of Cyprus?

assuming that a gc would accept the term "intervention" ?
as soon as the coupists lost power - 2 days after the invasion.

instead - the second face of the invasion took place, against a prefectly legal cypriot goverment, which simply destroyed any argument for "intervention".

[Get Real!]

Some of you have agreed that the Turkish intervention was legal but the continued "occupation" is not. Can we have a date on when Turkey should have given the island back to the legal government of Cyprus?

I for one NEVER agreed that Turkey had/has ANY rights to Cyprus and I have the evidence to prove it which I won't use now because this is "court" material.

I challenge ALL Cypriots to FIRST PROVE that Turkey HAD/HAS ANY RIGHTS to Cyprus before answering your question.

[denizaksulu]

If the matter in hand is "sub-judiciary" then the thread should be closed till the the proceedings begin

[humanist]

GR Turkey never had and does not have any rights to Cyprus ....... there was never an intervention, only an illegal occupation of Cyprus and a violation of human rights, ethnically cleansing 200000 refugees and ongoing oppression of Turkish spaeking Cypriots.

Now we know that anything said against Turkey is under Turkish constitution is insulting Turkishness therefore many and probably the majority of Turkish speaking Cypriots currently living under the Turkish army would be terrified with their lives to sday anything against Turkey and its occupation of Cyprus, with the pretence of protection for the Turkish speaking Cypriot citizenship.

I often wonder whether people are really afraid of even moving south in case they are followed and the rest will be history.

[Murataga]

cypezokyli wrote-

a prefectly legal cypriot goverment

This one was my favourite (!) The government in which all TCs were ousted from their posts for refusing to succumb to ENOSIS.... The government who had made its official policy to hand over the indepenedence of the island to Greece.... The government who had invitied the Greek troops to butcher their fellow TCs for refusing ENOSIS and to create a fait accompli of its annexation to Greece.... The government whose ministers wrote the Akritas plan.... You want me to go on with your "perfectly legal government" ?

[bigOz]

Some of you have agreed that the Turkish intervention was legal but the continued "occupation" is not. Can we have a date on when Turkey should have given the island back to the legal government of Cyprus?

I for one NEVER agreed that Turkey had/has ANY rights to Cyprus and I have the evidence to prove it which I won't use now because this is "court" material.

I challenge ALL Cypriots to FIRST PROVE that Turkey HAD/HAS ANY RIGHTS to Cyprus before answering your question.

Before you can challenfge anything - let's hear what rights Greece has to Cyprus! Screw court material, speak only when you have proof, not without any hard matrial to substantiate stupid claims!

[bigOz]

Some of you have agreed that the Turkish intervention was legal but the continued "occupation" is not.

nobody that i know (referring to gcs always) agreed with the term intervention.

Can we have a date on when Turkey should have given the island back to the legal government of Cyprus?

assuming that a gc would accept the term "intervention" ?
as soon as the coupists lost power - 2 days after the invasion.

instead - the second face of the invasion took place, against a prefectly legal cypriot goverment, which simply destroyed any argument for "intervention".

What a load of b***ocks! Are you for real, or another brain dead GC? What kind of a perfectly legal Cypriot government are you referring to when only few days before Nikos Sampson was the president, and the EOKA supporting mainland Greek army's presence nearing 100,000 at the time was still there!

Who was to stop EOKA regaining power in Cyprus immediately after such a quick withdrawal, who had effectively killed all GC armed resistance with Turkish forces clearing the rest - who were left alone by the fleeing cowards of the EOKA?

If Turkey did not intervene, probably most of you taking part in this forum would not have been around to write such comical posts because EOKA would have probably succedded in killing another 100,000 Greek and Turkish Cypriots alike, before ruling the island with Nikos Sampson as the president, under a fascist dictatorship. No one in UN or Europe was slightly interested in internvening at the time!

If ity were not for Turkey's intervention / invasion, how many AKEL members or supporters would have been alive today? GET ON YOUR KNEES AND PRAY FOR THE BALLS TURKEY HAD FOR INTERVENING WHEN THEY DID TO SAVE YOUR SORRY ASSES!

[Get Real!]

cypezokyli wrote-

a prefectly legal cypriot goverment

This one was my favourite (!) The government in which all TCs were ousted from their posts for refusing to succumb to ENOSIS....

That is incorrect Murataga. The TC Ministers and Vice President walked out in protest of not agreeing on various issues upon Ankara's advice and/or request.