by Diogenes » Sun May 20, 2007 2:11 am
Thank you all for you replies so far...
- Dear Nikephoros, i am neither a lunatic nor a pagan. I do NOT have a religion, and i do NOT believe in a god or gods, but it is more than certain
to me that paganism is way more interesting religion than christianity, and polytheism is a more reasonable alternative than monotheism for those who want to believe. Paganism is also less "psychotic", and most importantly, it is
a Greek religion, where christianity is NOT. Also, just look what the Greeks produced as pagans, and what they produced as christians.
- Dear GorillaGal , you point is very on target. I agree, "the state does NOT express the opinion of every greek either". The thing, though, is that the philosophy, policies, laws, character, priorities, etc, of a state could change. It's up to us. The state itself supports institutions, and laws, that allow us to do that (elections, courts, debates, SCIENCE, etc), where the church does NOT.
- Dear Miltiades, I am sorry to hear about your story. But why did you do a christian wedding, since you didn't want one? Why did you played along with their SICK ideolohy who as you said treats "people not married in church as sinners" ? And what's the need, really, in baptizing the children? Did you know that "baby-baptism" is not even part of the Bible? Where did the church get that from, and why do they do it? Isn't the most SICK thing in the world to think that every innocent little baby is born as a sinner? In my opinion, "baby-baptism" is a CRIME...
I also totally agree with you. The church's policies and ethics are still based on standards from the Middle Ages. That's what happens when you demonize science and not keeping up with the rest of the world. Imagine, many christians even today still believe that the earth was created 5,000 years ago, even though geologists, and geoscientists, established that this is ridiculous.
- Dear Sotos, no worries. Thanks for clarifying...
Now, here is another question to all of you:
Why should the church even be allowed to participate in state affairs, considering the fact that they do NOT pay taxes (or serve in the army)?
All members of the state pay taxes, serve in the army, etc, but they don't. Why should they, then, have a say in affairs that they are not involved?
Or why should they have a say in education, for example, since they themselves oppose to a main body of scientific knowledge which comes contrary to their dogmas (eg. no evidence of a creator, prayer does not work, evolution is a fact,etc)?
What do you think?