The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


suggestion for censorship

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

suggestion for censorship

Postby GorillaGal » Fri May 04, 2007 12:36 am

since we have been discussing freedom of speech and censorship in another thread, i suggest a personal form of censorship. just drop the "Greek" and "Turkish" part of identifying Cypriots. it is apparent that Cyprus belongs to both cultures, you all should just get used to it. maybe it's a little idealialistic on my part...i come from a very culturally diverse country. i am an American. for the most part, we are all Americans here. we don't identify each other by tagging on our heritage. the only time i have to identify my heritage is for surveys or if a foreigner asks me. i can still be proud of my heritage, but i don't have to identify myself by it.

i know this has come up before in different threads. i appologize for my redundancy. but it has been on my mind all day after reading the freedom of speech thread. i just think that getting rid of the "Greek" or "Turkish" is going to be a start in reunification.
User avatar
GorillaGal
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:31 am
Location: new york

Postby kafenes » Fri May 04, 2007 12:43 am

Easier said then done GG, only today I had to fill in a form for the transfer of a car and there was a box with three choices to tick and said :
"Greek Cyptiot, Turkish Cypriot and Other", well I happen to be neither a GC or TC and I refuse to call myself 'Other' as I am more Cypriot then most Cypriots.
User avatar
kafenes
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 2:43 am
Location: Paphos

Postby Piratis » Fri May 04, 2007 1:52 am

The division of Cypriots based on ethnic background is not new.

Since Cyprus was almost always ruled by some others, the representatives of those others in Cyprus were the higher class and the locals the second class.

Then during the Ottoman rule a Muslim minority was created, which was considered by the Ottomans as a higher class than the Christian majority. So during the Ottomans the split was between Muslim (Turkish) VS Christians (Greek).

Then the British during their rule maintained that split, since it suited perfectly their divide and rule practices.

What is even worst than all that however, is that in 1960 we were given some "independence" where this GC / TC thing became part of the constitution. I am sure GG would not be able to even imagine a USA constitution that made references and gave different rights to people based on their ethnic background. Unfortunately thats what was given to us by those that had the power and wrote our constitution for us, instead of us.

In this respect, the US should have been a model for Cyprus. Everybody should be equal citizen without any kind of discrimination, but at the same time everybody to be free to refer to themselves in any way they wish, have any religion they wish, and speak whatever language they wish.

This GC/TC split not only creates conflict between us, but also Cypriots that are neither TCs or GCs can feel excluded.

Unfortunately this split still serves the interests of those that have the power, so I don't see it changing any time soon.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby GorillaGal » Fri May 04, 2007 2:01 am

but even more of a reason to rid yourself of the "greek" and "turkish" words, Piratis....
as for you, kafenes, could you have left that question about heritage blank? or perhaps everyone whould just use "other"???? starting this kind of a "revolution" starts one by one....
User avatar
GorillaGal
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:31 am
Location: new york

Postby Piratis » Fri May 04, 2007 2:09 am

GG, I don't think the problem is with the words. In the USA don't blacks call themselves "African Americans" and don't you also have people that identify with things like "Irish American" etc?

The problem is not with the words. The problem is when the ethnic background is used as a way to divide and categorize people and apply racist discriminations.

I believe people should be first and above all Cypriots, but at the same time be free to call themselves "Greek Cypriot", "Turkish Cypriot" etc, if thats what they want.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby GorillaGal » Fri May 04, 2007 3:06 am

yes Piratis, we do have african americans, native americans, mexican americans.... but it is not as prevelant as i seem to perceive it on this forum. the only time we really get asked about our ethnicity is when we fill out government papers or do surveys. otherwise, it is pretty evident from someone's name or perhaps thier looks what thier background might be. on this forum, if i heard someone ask one, i heard them ask a thousand times, "are you greek or turkish?"
i am not saying people shouldn't be proud of thier heritage. we should all be proud of our roots and where we come from. but how are we ever going to feel united as one people, as cypriots, as europeans, and earthlings, when we continue to alienate ourselves with tags such as "greek" or "turkish"?
question to you piratis: i know about the greeks and turks, but i also know from reading this forum taht there are russians and english there, among other groups. do they identify themselves as "russian cypriot" or "english cypriot"? just wondering.
User avatar
GorillaGal
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:31 am
Location: new york

Postby mem101 » Fri May 04, 2007 3:32 am

I personally do not see a problem with identifying with a prefix. I see myself as Turkish Cypriot. I would not change that in a vain hope that it would make a difference in the way that you seem to think it would. Having said that I would certainly correct someone who thought I was just Turkish but I would not necessarily if they refer to me as Cypriot.

I have seen people identify as Armenian Cypriot and English/British Cypriot.

Our labels do not define us; it is our actions, our words, our political, philosophical, religious and general views which define us, divide us, unite us.
mem101
Member
Member
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 12:29 am

Postby devil » Fri May 04, 2007 8:04 am

Piratis wrote:The division of Cypriots based on ethnic background is not new.


Oh, so wrong! Their ethnicity is the same, of Phoenician origin. It is only the language that separates them. This is similar to the Serbs and Croats, who even speak ± the same language but one uses the Latin alphabet and the other the Cyrillic.
devil
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1536
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:33 pm

Postby LENA » Fri May 04, 2007 2:54 pm

mem101 wrote:I personally do not see a problem with identifying with a prefix. I see myself as Turkish Cypriot. I would not change that in a vain hope that it would make a difference in the way that you seem to think it would. Having said that I would certainly correct someone who thought I was just Turkish but I would not necessarily if they refer to me as Cypriot.

I have seen people identify as Armenian Cypriot and English/British Cypriot.

Our labels do not define us; it is our actions, our words, our political, philosophical, religious and general views which define us, divide us, unite us.


:!: :!: :!: :!: :!:
User avatar
LENA
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4999
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 10:45 pm

Postby GorillaGal » Fri May 04, 2007 2:56 pm

i guess you agree with that one, Lena.
But as long as you have those prefixes, your actions and words...that define you, end up becoming sterotypes. no?
User avatar
GorillaGal
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4458
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 12:31 am
Location: new york

Next

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests