Nikephoros wrote:To my horror I just checked the Tony Angastiniotis answers to Cyprus Forum thread and he says he is working on a book!
So a small handful of Armenian diaspora historians have changed the historical discourse for good. But look at Greek Cypriots, there are no real good English accounts using compelling evidence to debunk the Turkish and Turkish Cypriot defaming of history. Instead Greek Cypriots have men like Angastiniotis, historical ignorants to lend crediblity to the Turkish defamation campaigns regarding the events surrounding the Turkish invasion of Cyprus.
Has Hellenism fallen so badly on Cyprus?
Nikephoros wrote:To my horror I just checked the Tony Angastiniotis answers to Cyprus Forum thread and he says he is working on a book!
So a small handful of Armenian diaspora historians have changed the historical discourse for good. But look at Greek Cypriots, there are no real good English accounts using compelling evidence to debunk the Turkish and Turkish Cypriot defaming of history. Instead Greek Cypriots have men like Angastiniotis, historical ignorants to lend crediblity to the Turkish defamation campaigns regarding the events surrounding the Turkish invasion of Cyprus.
Has Hellenism fallen so badly on Cyprus?
LENA wrote:
Nikephoros ... that book has finished and he is working on a new project against the Turks. I would like your opinion on that. Why you say he is historical ignorant....do you think that what he said or what he capture in his camera or wrote in his book are lies?
turkish_cypriot wrote:
The Turks speak out against Taner Akcam and you cry about how bad Turks are yet you're quick to turn and do tha same to Angastiniotis because (as you so nicely put it) he does not parrot your official state history..
Are you sure you're not a Turk in Christian disguise?
Nikephoros wrote:LENA wrote:
Nikephoros ... that book has finished and he is working on a new project against the Turks. I would like your opinion on that. Why you say he is historical ignorant....do you think that what he said or what he capture in his camera or wrote in his book are lies?
He is not a historian. What the Greek Cypriots need is a real historian to comb through the published memoirs/books/writings of Denktash, Kucuk, Ecevit, Turkish soldiers accounts of the invasion and then use their own sources to incriminate them and their lies. That is the kind of thing real historians like Dadrian do. All Angastiniotis does is try to balance between two sides for reconciliation and this evident in his thread. That is not what historians do. Only Greek Cypriots really have that loser mentality toward history, no serious historians think like that. The better historians try to find the most compelling sources to uncover the past, not interviewing Turkish Cypriots 30+ years after.
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests